Ah. So we leave good people to starve, so that capitolism can thrive. I see.
Perhaps you missed my statement that this is THE poorest AND least densely
populated county in the USA. There IS no industry no work, no opportunity
and the education system has failed these people. The 9 year drought has
made cattle ranching almost impossible, too.
The only natural resource to speak of are the uranium mines that were closed
in the 60's/
So tell me Mark, how do you justify leaving people to die when they were
guaranteed food medical care and education? You DO know that the nations are
sovereign, right? That these agreements amount to international treaties
with the one stipulation that they follow Federal law and that is enforced
by the BIA and FBI?
So Mark, are your theories more important than international treaties and
the lives of people who gave up everything through coercion?
Explain to me, please, the logic of that, and how the deaths of these people
fit into the chain of priorities. I am curious what is more important than
keeping our treaties to people who have no opportunity or resources.
On 6/25/06, mark robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> If by "the current situation" you mean govt welfare, then the
> answer is number 3. Great elaboration as to how and why it is the
> best answer is contained in the paper (and in basic Libertarian
> principles). Briefly those consist of explaining that welfare
> stifles interest in business and innovation and work, and how
> stopping welfare increases said interest which then raises the
> standard of living by decreasing poverty through capitalism.
>
> -Mark
>
> PS: Thank-you for being more polite.
>
>
>
> ************
> {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
> "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
> case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
> There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
> unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
> its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
> unjust lawsuits.
> See www.fija.org
> [Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
>
> ----------------------
>
>
> >
> > You claim my position offers "no solutions or alternatives",
> but
> > that's only because it does not offer them in the form of
> > more/modified welfare handouts. You claim the paper is "all
> > bullshit" for the same reason: because it disagrees with your
> > notion that (modified?) welfare is the solution (to problems
> > caused by welfare).
> >
>
> Alright Mark, you tell me...without having to repeat all the
> facts, what do
> YOU suggest?
> 1. Leave the current situation in place.
>
> 2. Change it to something else.
>
> 3. Eliminate it and leave the people to fend for themselves.
>
> Please, if you choose to change it, HOW would you change it?
>
> If you can not answer that, this conversation is simply a moor
> example of
> mental masturbation.
>
>
>
--
*****************************************
"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang
separately!" ...Ben Franklin
******************************************
Are YOU Preparing For The November '06 Elections NOW???
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
