Of course private people have a right to their own free association rights. I don't think I saw anyone here arguing otherwise. However, the manifesto point I referred to earlier clearly calls for the state (government) to stop tolerating (outlaw) interracial marriage, licentiousness, homosexuality and other things that bother the CofCC.
There is a difference between what Macko is saying and what is actually said on the CofCC's own manifesto. I know, Gordon Baum says they don't want to outlaw interracial marriages. Their own website says otherwise. This is plain as day. Further, an organization that just wanted to be left alone would not need the state to not "tolerate" the free association rights and sexual practices of others in such detail. They would simply need their own private property rights protected, rather than calling on the state to no longer tolerate the individual rights of those with which they disagree. Macko is refusing to see the difference. And there is a big difference. __________________________________________________________________ James Landrith [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell: 703-593-2065 * fax: 760-875-8547 AIM: jlnales * ICQ: 148600159 MSN and Yahoo! Messenger: jlandrith Taking the Gloves Off - http://www.jameslandrith.com The Multiracial Activist - http://www.multiracial.com The Abolitionist Examiner - http://www.multiracial.com/abolitionist/ __________________________________________________________________ _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cory Nott Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 4:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Contracts, Marital and Otherwise was Re: [Libertarian] Re: The Fallacy of Open I Private people have the inherent right to choose their associations which includes avoiding association with people they deem to be acting immorally or are otherwise undesirable. I disagree with the stance of David's organization (and I'm in an interracial marriage myself), but it's not hard to see that what they want is to not be forced by the state to associate with people like me whether in their homes, their schools (private I hope), places of business, or other private property. The state should not prohibit association nor should it force them. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
