https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172824
--- Comment #18 from Mr Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #17) > (In reply to Mr Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart from comment #16) > > I don't understand why this matters, at all. > > Google's choice of its own typefaces is not a justification for us choosing > its typefaces. Also, typeface choices of mobile phones are of little > relevance to choices for desktops and of limited relevance for laptops, and > those are the two main kinds of machines LO is used on. The choice of font on any form factor should be identical, insofar as its display resolution is not unrealistically low, because the same languages are written-in and read, so the same code-point coverage is required as is elsewhere. Because upstream `com.android.settings` does not permit modification of the OS-defined typeface order, Noto being chosen as high up the list (usually, a fall-back, after Roboto or Google Sans) is a significant indication of its use as a general-purpose typeface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
