https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172824
--- Comment #16 from Mr Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #14) > (In reply to Mr Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart from comment #0) > > As aforestated, “Considering that AOSP (SDK ⋛ 35), > > That's: > > 1. A Google-controlled environment, > 2. for mobile phones and tablets I don't understand why this matters, at all. --- > > and all desktop Linux distributions, utilise Noto Sans by default > > 1. That's just false. Unless I've misunderstood your claim. Indeed. I intended to quantify it with “most”, rather than “all”. --- > 2. I assume you meant Noto Serif for Writer, Noto Sans for Calc, Impress and > Draw. Rather, I referred to it being the default for all software (that does not override it), DE-wide. Consequently, it is pre-installed. --- > Finally, I also weakly-oppose because this font is associated with Google. > Symbolically, I believe that is an association we should avoid. But like I > said, that is a weak objection in itself. I do not believe that we should ever consider symbolicism as justification. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
