https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71534
--- Comment #8 from Joel Madero <[email protected]> --- IMHO this report doesn't provide anything clear that we can use going forward. My suggestion is mark as INVALID. If there are specific individual things that we want (such as openID) I suggest a bug report (enhancement) for the one single thing and that "bugzilla" or whatever is in the title of the bug. If this report is just saying 1. No registration my vote is no (but open to openID which should be its own report) 2. Allow users to submit documents without mandatory steps required again my vote is no (I think requirements should be stricter actually) 3. Allow users to submit without info about their system again, my vote is no (absolutely not, complete waste of QA's time, again I think the requirement should be stricter) 4. The "questions" by the system As Qubit has mentioned - we're talking about a BSA version 2.0 - this is really Qubit and Rob's project - I am hardly in a position to demand anything of their time as I can't contribute much on the technical side. I do plan on diagramming out questions so that they can use what they want when we get to that project (which won't be until 2014 or later, this is valid but should be in its own bug with clear and precise language) I guess because it's pretty unclear what exactly is being asked here other than the three things above (which actually is 4 reports in one I suspect), again my suggestion is marking as INVALID. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
