2008/9/9 Anders Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So what do you say? Is it time for a release or does anyone have a good > reason for waiting?
+1 for doing a release. > I could do it if someone tells me how it's done. (I couldn't find any page > in trac how to do it so it might be an idea to write one.) The procedure goes something like this: 1. Update/verify http://licq.org/wiki/DeveloperArea/ReleaseNotes/1.3.6 2. Get http://svn.licq.org/svn/trunk/scripts/create-licq-tarball.sh 3. Run ./create-licq-tarball.sh -n licq-1.3.6-rc1 -g -b -s -r <rev> where <rev> is the revision that should become rc1. This will create a gz and bz2 tarball and sign them. 4. Get http://svn.licq.org/svn/trunk/scripts/tag-licq-release.sh 5. Run ./tag-licq-release.sh -v 1.3.6-rc1 -r <rev>. This will create a tag in svn. 6. Upload the tarballs somewhere and ask Jon to upload them to sf.net. 7. Update http://licq.org/wiki/LicqDownload 8. Send mail to licq-dev, licq-users and licq-announce 9. Write news entry on http://licq.org/ All taken from memory, so I hope I haven't forgotten anything. > Also, should the new release be version 1.3.6? > I know I've done some changes to the plugin API that are not be 100% > backwards compatible, would that be reason enough to call it 1.4.0 instead? Don't know our "rules" for this, but 1.4.0 might be the right thing to do. /Erik -- Erik Johansson Home Page: http://ejohansson.se/ PGP Key: http://ejohansson.se/erik.asc
