> OK, I have rewritten the code for augmentation dot positioning.

Great, and thanks a lot!

> Personally, I like the results of this code better than the Gould
> recommendations.  I would use this code, and make the default value
> of chord-dots-limit be 1.

I agree.

> I'm attaching a copy of Dots.pdf created with the new code.  I have
> not updated any of the markups describing the results, because this
> allows you to better see the differences, I think.

This looks very good, but there are two glitches, namely 13b and 23b,
which can't be right.  23c looks wrong, too.


lilypond-user mailing list

Reply via email to