Would it be possible to let the list go, but tied in with a
recommendation for people to subscribe to Direct-L? Historically
Lingo-L was where you asked Lingo specific questions, and Direct-L
was where all other related topics were talked about (sometimes the
topics were even about Director). These days Direct-L does get into
deep scripting discussions, and some of the big guns do join in. For
example, I have about six e-mails from James Newton on Lingo-L from
the last three years (ones I didn't get around to deleting), and
about 20 on Direct-L from the last year alone.
As for Eudora, I am still using it, but I have version 6.2.1. Did you
tend to keep up to date with it?
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [email protected] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up ... Bertil Flink
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up now? Colin Holgate
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up ... Alex da Franca
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up now? Tab Julius
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up ... Alex da Franca
- Re: <lingo-l> Old lingo-l emails showing up now? Kurt Griffin
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was: Old li... Tab Julius
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was: Ol... John R. Sweeney Jr
- RE: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was... Bryan Thompson
- RE: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L ... Irv Kalb
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was: Ol... Colin Holgate
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was... Cole Tierney
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was: Ol... Slava Paperno
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was... Ross Clutterbuck
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L Tab Julius
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lin... Lists
- RE: <lingo-l> Future of... Stany De Roos
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lin... arjen
- Re: <lingo-l> Future of Lingo-L (was: Ol... Cole Tierney
