Lutz Paelike wrote:
But Director looks more and more like a semi-abandoned piece of software.
I think there are two possibilities:
- putting more effort(=money,developers,support) into director like flash gets
- or shutting it down and concentrating on a migration path to flash
I agree with that. Director interface looks obsolete. I can't believe Director still has only one "Undo" (I don't know MX2004, but MX does).
Also, there is the impossibility to stick the videos inside the projector to protect them.
And the impossibility to change the icon in the projector file (I think that changed in MX2004).
One thing more: Director should remember the zoom I am using on a project, because if I'm working on a 1024x768 project, it always opens 100% zoomed.
So, the developers are doing a good work updating some parts of Director, but there are still problems and annoyances that makes it difficult to use.
I'd love Director to have other advanced functions without the use of Xtras, smaller projector sizes, and to be able to separate the whole movie into scenes (like flash) would make it so much easier to use.
Nothing more. I hope nobody gets hurt with my opinion.
Julian Rodriguez (PS: My native language is Spanish, I'm sorry for any misspelling) [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
