> Let me recommend VM:Secure in place of RACF. It's a much > better product, easier to use and far more capable.
Second the motion, unless you have a mandate to share the authentication database (and fair warning: this is *hard* to do right. Do NOT skip any steps in the setup -- you'll regret it if you do). VM:Secure is a far superior tool. (I wish CA would realize this and do a z/OS interface to VM:Secure instead of fooling around with TopSecret, IMHO, a far, far inferior product in function and UI). Even if you do share the RACF database, that still doesn't get you LDAP authentication. VM would use the internal RACF interfaces. -- db ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
