> > > > Vi and emacs both suck. Text editors are for losers. The only real > editor is a line editor. Worship ed or its bastard cousin edlin. > > ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > `:::' Kevin Sivits ....... ...... > ::: * `::. ::' one world > ::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :' one people > ::: :: :: :: :: :: :::. one goverment > ::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::. one OS > ..:::.....................::' .::::. > Hi Kevin, Be careful, my good fellow. You say that text editors are for losers, but even ed and edlin are for editing text. Maybe the best way to avoid being labeled a "loser" is to use TeX, which is, of course, a typesetter. Grin! Best wishes, Bill (an emacs user, but not a loser).
- Re: Pointers (again) Glynn Clements
- Re: Pointers (again) Kevin Sivits
- Re: Pointers (again) holotko
- Re: Pointers (again) James
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Pointers (again) [offtopic] James
- [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Moshe Zadka
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Herry Budiutama
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Kevin Sivits
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Glynn Clements
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi James
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi MCENANEY WILLIAM J
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi John Gorman
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Joel Robert Oliveira
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi James
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi James
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi Herry Budiutama
- Re: [offtopic] Emacs vs vi James