Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-07-16T23:43:19, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> _Of course_ quorumd does that job better - that's why I designed it -
>> over Lars' violent objections ;-).
>
> I didn't object to quorumd, I objected to it being "supported" at that
> point in time, because it's not well tested nor maintained.
You explained to me at length what a useless and stupid idea it was -
especially for split-site clusters and how it could never possibly work.
As you no doubt recall, you even did did _much more_ than merely
object, you were planning on removing it from the SUSE-provided
Heartbeat RPMs, until I promised to escalate it with IBM.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
