Linux-Misc Digest #32, Volume #19 Sun, 14 Feb 99 17:13:12 EST
Contents:
Re: PCI pnp modem ??? (Lee Prior Collier)
Re: Newbie: Kernel compile error (Lee Prior Collier)
Lesstif on Linux 2.0.35 (RedHat 5.1 Manhattan) ("Mig Killer")
Re: Advanced RAM usage question... (Andrei A. Dergatchev)
Linux & overclocked CPU ("A.G.")
Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix (Chris Allen)
Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers (Andrew Foakes)
Re: !Re: Help: One way Cable Modems (Dave)
Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix (Andreas Schyman)
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux (Andreas Schyman)
email problem (Irwin Taranto)
Re: Netscape 4.04 closes (Hans Wolters)
xfig discussion: where'w it at? (Timothy Buckelew)
Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers (Kinkster)
Re: Space Station uses 95/NT, disaster imminent (no joke) (Robert B. Love)
Re: From RedHat to Slackware (brian moore)
Re: Need numbercruncher advice (Johan Kullstam)
Re: Why Does Linux Thrash So Bad? (James Youngman)
Penguin Tiff style image? (Spectra Logic Staffing)
SEK'D Prodif cards (James Pritchett/Frances White)
Strange problem with devices. (John Garrison)
MouseKeys for Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Redhat Linux secure server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: good kernel 2.2.1 upgrade FAQ ? (Ben Russo)
Re: restoring ext2 partition (Ben Russo)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Lee Prior Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PCI pnp modem ???
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 19:28:20 +0000
L J Bayuk wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >It's getting sort of hard to find a "non-winmodem".... I found one ! , A
> >Zoltrix, but it's
> >a PCI / pnp type. (%!#@!#@!*&^!!)
> >Can ANYONE point my nose in the right direction ???? ( how ) Can I
> >set this thing up
> >to be COM2, under Linux somehow ....
> > I forgot to add I DO NOT run WinDOZE .. anywhere. So it's Linux
> >or nothing.
> >
> Sorry, I think your PCI modem is a "winmodem by another name".
> But take a look at: http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
> He has a really extensive modem list and identifies windows-only
> modems.
or http://www.winmodems.org/ - but I don't know which is the most
comprehensive.
------------------------------
From: Lee Prior Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie: Kernel compile error
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 19:33:12 +0000
syed wrote:
I don't really know, but try a 'make clean' before the make dep?
> Sorry if this is the wrong newsgroup for this problem !
>
> I have just tried and failed to compile the kernel (2.0.35) which came with
> the Redhat 5.1 distribution I have installed. I then tried to install kernel
> 2.2.1
> by following the instructions in the accompanying readme. I did :
>
> "make mrproper" (from /usr/src/linux)
> "make xconfig"
> "make dep"
> "make zImage"
>
> <SNIP>
------------------------------
From: "Mig Killer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lesstif on Linux 2.0.35 (RedHat 5.1 Manhattan)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 14:46:20 -0500
Activity:
installing, via compilation, xacc-1_0_18, accounting
Problem:
xacc requires Lesstif (or Motif)
Indications:
./configure (for Lesstif)
fails - can't find X
./configure --x-includes=/usr/X11R6 --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6
fails - can't find -lICE
requires Xt 5 or 6
./configure --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib
fails - same as above
Notes:
The library configuration under RedHat looks screwey. As near as I can
figure, Lesstif prefers /usr/include/X11R6 and /usr/lib/X11R6 whereas RedHat
5.1 RPM creates those directories backasswards. There is an 'el'ICE library
and the Xt 6 libraries in /usr/X11R6/lib ... but, still config errors.
I understand XFree86 3.3.3 is available. I understand there are problems
with this version under RedHat. I don't want RedHat Motif.
This installation of Linux is experimental. The vanilla pre-installed RPMs
appear to work: XFree86, Netscape, Apache. The gcc++ 2.7.2 appears to be
working ... sort of ... it wiped out my /usr/include when it installed ...
I'm partially rebuilt.
I'm perfectly willing to switch to another Linux version if that will be
less painful. I don't want to tweak more than a week just to install an
accounting package.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei A. Dergatchev)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Advanced RAM usage question...
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:27:05 GMT
[removed .admin group]
Hi,
I guess it's ok. After long calculations including a heavy swapping
I often see 110M in buffers and only 18M left from my 128 :-) (Slack
too) However, a system performs as usual - I suppose the kernel uses
RAM correspondingly to where and how it needs a memory.
Rgds,
Andrei
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999 15:16:19 -0500, "news.rogers.ca"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
> I just added an additional 48 megs of RAM to my slackware Linux system
>and after a week of usage I have 5 megs free (when I run "free" I see this)
>and 45 Megs in Buffers.
>
> My question is, what do those buffers do and should I be worried that I
>have a running program with a memory leak? After all I only have 5 megs
>free... I was expecting to see 45 megs free.
>
>Thanks!
>Luc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: "A.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Linux & overclocked CPU
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 17:10:16 -0500
Hi all:
Problem:
- ABIT BX6 MB + Celeron300A CPU. Overclocked to 450.
- Linux 2.0.36 won't boot up after overclocking. It goes through all
initialization stuff at startup, and then, just when it's supposed to
display "login" prompt, it would reboot the 'puter. If I take the speed back
to 300Mhz, everything works. NT and w98 work perfectly on overclocked
computer..
I suspect it's the memory. I have 96M, 32 of which is non-100Mhz. Could this
be the thing? Maybe I should adjust smth in BIOS setup?
Any input greately appreciated. If you can, please cc by email.
Arcady
------------------------------
From: Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 15:54:44 -0500
Mike Khalili wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 04:06:27 -0800, Richard Latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 11:35:47 -0500, "Carlos A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>I'm wondering if Explorer 4.0 that Microsoft offers for download if it
> >will
> >>>work under RedHat 5.2 / KDE ? Will it work under Linux?
> >>
> >>WHY????? The whole point of using Linux is to get out of the
> >>MS-Monopoly
> >
> >Is there any package for Linux that comes anywhere near the functionality
> >of IE?
>
> Yes. Linux does have web browsers.
>
> Unless you are referring to some magic voodoo power that IE has that I'm
> unaware of.
I don't know how it would work under *nix, but under windows, IE5.0 is
the fastest browser around (Faster than Opera on my machines). Still,
I'd be wary about installing any MS package on my Linux box. Netscape
has it's problems, but Netscape the company doesn't have any motives for
harming my system.
Chris
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Foakes)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:42:19 +0000
Kinkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe it was Robert Bork ( the former Supreme Court nominee) that
> suggested ... that MS itself would be broken up into 3 companies all
> with the same rights to Windows, IE, Office products etc. That's
> basically what they did with Standard Oil and I think it would _really_
> promote some competition and innovation.
Hmmm ... Standard Oil is actually a good example of the dangers of
intervention. Standard Oil was considered dangerous due to its monopoly
on lighting oil. (It's monopoly on heating oil wasn't considered such a
threat as there was wood and coal.) Electric lighting would always be
too expensive, so there wouldn't be sufficient competition from that
sector for the foreseeable future and that insignificant compnay called
Shell would never get big if they continued only to supply oil to that
irrelevent group of geeks who messed around with automobiles when they
should be grooming the horses. And then there is this guy Darcy who
insists that something big might be found in Persia, but he's just a
crank and Persia is just a back water ...
The rest, as they say, is history.
[OK OK I've distorted the facts, but you get my drift, I hope]
Personally, I suspect that Microsift are levering their OS monopoly to
sell other applications, but I don't think they should be split up for
that even if I'm right. Microsoft is not, and never has been, a
technology company. They are a marketing company and as such have
taught the IT community that a salesman will always be richer than an
inventor, which is hardly a new revelation. The only thing I think
should be done to Microsoft at this stage is to force the company to
operate with walls - i.e. the OS division must be seen to make a
stand-alone profit and publish all correspondance with the appliocations
division, etc. Both could then stay in the company, reward MS share
holders for their investment and yet enforce a level playing field.
In this senario, IE should be an application, not part of the OS, IMHO.
-= Andrew and Elaine Foakes ===========================================-
------------------------------
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: !Re: Help: One way Cable Modems
Date: 14 Feb 1999 15:17:05 -0600
Pavel Greenfield wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jim!
>
> But does Linux in principle support a connection to the internet via a
> combination of ethernet and modem?
>
It does here! SurfBoard 1200 external, accessed thru a Windows 2000
proxy server.
Linux doesn't know (or need to know) that's it's a "combination"
connection. It's just sending data out thru eth0 and getting it back
the same way.
Dave
------------------------------
From: Andreas Schyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:55:01 +0100
> Im a web developer and sadly I have to say that IE4 is far better with java
> script and Css. Netscape claims they have full suport for it but i dont
> agree with that!
>
> So yes,, as long as netscape cant show every page on the net i would say
> that there would be nice to have ie 4!
Well, the thing is that there is a standard for HTML, css and
javascript, however, NS and MS doesn�t really care about the standards.
They rather develop there own enhanced browsers. As a webdeveloper you
should also be aware of that there are thing NS can do that IE can�t, so
it�s not that IE has a better support, it�s just different.
Anyways, there are ways to make pages look and behave the same way,
without having to write different pages for the browsers. Just alter the
scripts a bit and import different scripts into the page depending on
the viewers browser...
Andreas
------------------------------
From: Andreas Schyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 21:56:54 +0100
Jim Esparza wrote:
>
> Have been reading quite a few of the HOWTO's lately trying to get
> Redhat 5.2 installed on my machine. According to the Linux+NT-Loader
> document, standard Linux can't access NTFS. BUT, to quote the document:
>
> "An alpha driver that can read NTFS-Partitions is available at
>
> http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~loewis/ntfs"
>
Looks like that HOW-TO is a bit old... The new kernel do come with a
driver that is able to read from NTFS, but not write.
Andreas.
------------------------------
From: Irwin Taranto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: email problem
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:20:05 -0800
I have installed RedHat 5.2.
I can connect to my ISP via PPP. I can send and receive email via
Netscape. I can send email via the mail command.
However, when I try to read mail via fetchmail, I connect okay, it tells
me how many message to down load, starts to download the first message
and then abborts with the message:
"terminated with signal 13"
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Irwin Taranto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans Wolters)
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.04 closes
Date: 14 Feb 1999 21:23:01 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henry Meyerding wrote:
:Ben Russo wrote:
:
:> Find out whether you are using a libc4 or glibc system.
:> Then go and get the Netscape 4.0x (x being latest minor revision number)
:> rpm.
:>
:> Use rpm -U to upgrade.
:> See if the problem still exists.
:
:OK, so I did that. Now it ate all my java stuff. HELP. When I connect to
:a web page with java, I get an error saying
:
: Java reported the following error on startup:
:
: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: java/applet/Applet
:
:I had JDK 1.1.5 installed before this but I am uncertain how to recover from
:whatever Netscape has done to my setup. ...
Think that the setup has been messsing with your CLASSPATH var.
Regards Hans
--
Java Search Engine Front End
http://home.gelrevision.nl/~h.wolter/
Linux Links/CMI8330 Soundpro HOWTO
http://home.gelrevision.nl/~h.wolter/linux.htm
------------------------------
From: Timothy Buckelew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfig discussion: where'w it at?
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 20:59:04 +0000
Hi, out there!
Does anybody know where xfig discussions might be? There's nothing
right now in "x" or "graphics".
Thanks.
Timothy Buckelew
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kinkster)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:15:40 GMT
As a follow up to that 20/20 or one of the news shows had a special on
SUV's and they found that though they account for roughly 15% of the
vehicles on the road they are involved in about 30% of the accidents.
Here in Mich. with our snowy/icy wintertime roads our dumb SOB (some)
SUV drivers forget that though they can go despite bad road conditions
they can't stop any quicker (usually longer) than the normal car can.
They get a false sense of security and wind up causing accidents, not
to mention the damn problem of trying to see around these behemoths at
intersections to see if there's any oncoming traffic.
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999 18:35:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Mayor Of R'lyeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>allow it. While not an actual regulation it was government pressure
>>that has gotten the SUVs lowered and lightened thus lessening the
>>safety of the last really safe class of vehicles left.
>
>I don't buy that one. I've seen an Isuzu Trooper go fairly far up on
>two weels at slowish (~50-55?) freeway speeds just trying to center itself
>in a lane suddenly.
>
>And, of course, SUV's are more dangerous *TO OTHER DRIVERS*. If you share
>responsibility for injury and death between both cars in an accident, it
>becomes painfully obvious that SUV's are horribly dangerous. In addition,
>they are a traffic hazard. I've been nearly-hit by SUV's about once a month
>since they started being popular, because the morons who drive them think
>"oh, I'm safe, and if there's anything in my blind spot it's probably too
>short to hurt me", and merge without signalling or looking. I've had to try
>to guess whether or not there was oncoming traffic because a SUV was in my
>way.
>
>No, the solution isn't "everyone drives a SUV" - because if we do, then we
>end up duplicating a lot of the problems we'd have had if everyone were
>driving smaller cars, and we waste a *LOT* of resources moving around excess
>tonnage of metal no one really cares about.
>
>Does this mean I favor regulation? No. I favor slapping morons upside the
>head, and I favor making sure that people who drive vehicles which are
>particularly likely to damage or kill other people *are liable for those
>consequences*.
>
>Anyway, go re-do your research. There are a lot of troubles with SUV's,
>especially when they have to coexist with other cars.
>
>(Disclaimer: I drive an old station wagon that has been in three accidents,
>the net damage to my car being a bit of a scuff on one bumper. It's a nice
>old tank - and everyone can see over it, too.)
>
>-s
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert B. Love )
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Space Station uses 95/NT, disaster imminent (no joke)
Date: 13 Feb 1999 21:08:54 GMT
> >> In comp.os.linux.misc Michael C. Vergallen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 1 Feb 1999 19:56:23 GMT, Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> >>The International Space Station (ISS) is networking seven IBM PCs
> >> >>together using one NT box and three Win 95s. They are using
Windows
> >> >>based software to determine when the next communications pass will
> >> >>occur.
> >> >>Thoughts/Flames/Replies?
Where "on earth" did you get the idea the PCs were running NT. The
ISS will have many 486 computers in a 3 tier heirarchy. I don't know
what OS they run but I'm pretty sure it ain't NT. What do know for a
fact is that the crew has IBM Thinkpads to issue commands. Each Thinkpad
runs Solaris. I suspect that the Flight computers (MDMs) also run
Solaris
as the OS.
So consider the history of space ships as seen in the movies. First,
we have many large dials, switches and gauges. Then later they were
more aircraft like, then films likes Aliens had lots of custom computer
terminals in fixed locations. Turns out station, the crew will carry the
laptop with them and plug into a 1553 network when its required. Instead
of a dedicated display for Life Support (ECLSS) or Electrical Power (EPS)
the crewman just calls up that display and flicks a virtual switch.
Makes building the flight simulator kinda boring.
--
================================================================
Bob Love MIME & NeXT Mail OK
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: From RedHat to Slackware
Date: 14 Feb 1999 21:29:59 GMT
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:40:39 GMT,
Rob Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Homer wrote:
>
> > To my opinion Slackware is more easy to install then Redhat.
> > In Slackware you also get the helpful scripts that Redhat lacks
>
>
> Hmmm.....I've installed both, and for people with NO Unix experience,
> Red Hat is the way to go.
>
> However, like I said before, if you know what you're doing, Slackware is
> the way to go.
Well, I'm getting a new system delivered tomorrow. It'll have Red Hat
on it (since that's what the vendor ships). I'll keep it there until
Slack comes out with a version using a (stable) 2.2.x and glibc2
libraries by default.
I love Slack, but then, I'm a geek and have dinked with Unix since 1978.
I don't use package management (not even Slack's own installer after
installation) but instead just download source and build it.
I have installed my handy-dandy Slack3.5 CD onto a handful of systems
at work. I'd still like a full "choose everything you want and go get
lunch" sort of installer, but I make do. :)
I know a few novices that have managed to install Slack just fine, with
their only problems being the usual "RTFM" stuff. (Like setting up PPP,
which involves merely running 'ppp-setup' and answering the questions
about phone number to dial and such. Trivially easy -- if you read the
docs. :))
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: sci.math
Subject: Re: Need numbercruncher advice
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Feb 1999 16:54:34 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim G. S. OEyhus) writes:
> My computing needs has changed to heavy number crunching,
> which my current computers are unsuited for.
>
> I need lots of floating point performance, for little money.
> Perhaps I will just buy a processor and a motherboard, and
> cannibalize my existing equipment.
>
> I would like some advice on what to buy.
> Alpha? 2 upclocked celerons? Pentium 3?
alpha is good but more expensive than intel. if you are not doing a
parallel type problem, then buy as good an alpha computer as you can.
the alpha blows door off the intel line in floating point performance.
it depends on what your problem is. if you have a easy parallelizable
type problem (eg running a lot of monte carlo trials) then buying a
lot of `obsolete' hardware would be a good value.
i'd scour the computer shows and get a deal on some obsolete
equipment. i picked up a quad ppro for $800 back in november. i do
turbo code simulations on it and it gives a lot of bang for my buck.
--
Johan Kullstam [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Don't Fear the Penguin!
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Thrash So Bad?
Date: 14 Feb 1999 11:15:39 +0000
"Aaron M. Renn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a 300 MHz Pentium II with 128 MB of RAM and 512 MB of swap. But
> Linux goes into thrash mode all the time on me. If I've got X, two xterms,
> and two netscape instances up, it sometimes starts thrashing and never
> recovers.
Really? Run "vmstat 2" and see if this is disk IO (bi/bo figures
high) or swapping (si/so figures high).
> This is clearly ridiculous, espically since my netscape
> configuration allows only 20MB of memory cache. I've even had X
> crash with out of memory errors. My disk space is getting low on my
> normal filesystems, which seems to be associate with the problem for
> some reason. Any ideas? I'm running 2.0.36 BTW. Please respond via
> email. I'll summarize replies if warranted.
What does "free" report? Is the system log filling up with some kind
of repeated error message?
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: Spectra Logic Staffing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Penguin Tiff style image?
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 15:06:53 -0700
Does anyone know where I could get a Tiff image of the Linux Penguin?
Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!!!
------------------------------
From: James Pritchett/Frances White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.sound,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: SEK'D Prodif cards
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:22:58 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any experience (good or bad) with the SEK'D Prodif 32 or
Prodif 96 cards? These are also known as RME Digi32 and Digi32 Pro. I am
looking to set up a linux-based digital audio workstation and need to support
digital audio I/O. Thanks in advance.
James Pritchett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.music.princeton.edu/~jwp
------------------------------
From: John Garrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Strange problem with devices.
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:41:31 GMT
My computer was running fine, then after installing the rpm versions of
mame and dosemu (not related to the problem I'm sure, just what caused
me to notice it) my sound config messed up. I get a message telling me
that /dev/dsp is not configured. I know it is because It has been
working for the past year, but oh well. I ran setup and reconfigured my
sound. Sound started working again. Hooray!!. But, now my modem
doesn't work! it says that the device isn't configured. It IS
configured! The both worked in harmony before, what happened?
Also I rebooted my computer after unpluging it for a thunderstorm, and
my modem worked again but sound didn't. I don't want to have to choose
between modem and sound. Could somebody please help me as I am totally
baffled as to why this would happen all of a sudden.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MouseKeys for Linux
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 99 16:43:44 -0500
Does anyone know if there is a program, driver, etc that emulates Windows 95's
mousekeys?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redhat Linux secure server
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 14:03:01 -0800
I installed Redhat v5.2 which went OK; then I installed
Redhats secure server. At this point the non-secure server
will run but the secure server gets these error messages as
follows:
Starting httpsd: httpsd httpd: can not load module
"/usr/lib/apache/libproxy.so"
(/usr/lib/apache/libproxy.so: undefined symbol: ap_dummy_mutex)
httpd: can not load module "/usr/lib/apache/mod_access.so"
(/usr/lib/apache/mod_access.so: undefined symbol: ap_log_rerror)
httpd: can not load module "/usr/lib/apache/mod_actions.so"
(/usr/lib/apache/mod_actions.so: undefined symbol: ap_log_rerror)
There are many of the above error messages. The libraries
are in the /usr/lib/apache directory but it still will not
execute. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-**** Posted from remarQ, Discussions Start Here(tm) ****-
http://www.remarq.com/ - Host to the the World's Discussions & Usenet
------------------------------
From: Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: good kernel 2.2.1 upgrade FAQ ?
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:51:28 -0500
"A.G." wrote:
>
> Can smbd point me to the subj.?
>
> Thanx
>
> Arcady
try www.linuxhq.org
------------------------------
From: Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.development.system,alt.os.linux,alt.linux
Subject: Re: restoring ext2 partition
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 17:09:15 -0500
Renato Lukac wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Is it possible to restore an ext2 partition?
> I accidently did an mke2fs on the *wrong* partition. /dev/hdd (only
> hdd1).
>
> Thanks,!
>
> Regards, Renato
>
> ,'~`.
> \\|//
> ( o o ) Window$ is living proof of Murphy's
> Law -(@ @)-
> +--.oooO--(_)--Oooo.-*-*-*-------------------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.-+
> |Renato Lukac ** * ** |Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |Gimnazija M.Sobota G M S |WWW:http://www.s-gms.ms.edus.si/renato/|
> |Slovenija ******* |Tel.: + 386 / (0)69 / 38-260-106 |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reminds me of how my father told me that SHARP knifes are safer
than dull ones the first time I cut myself....
-Ben.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
