Linux-Misc Digest #125, Volume #19               Sun, 21 Feb 99 14:13:09 EST

Contents:
  Re: how to change permission bit on vfat partition? (Kent Robotti)
  Re: Linux suxxxx
  c++ compiler (Upali Bandara)
  Re: [Q] Serial Communication software for UNIX (Doug Hughes)
  How to add libstdc++.so.2.9 to slackware 3.6 (William Wong)
  Re: Please help with unconventional RedHat install.... ("Ken Abrahamsen")
  Re: Scary, no? (Frank Hahn)
  Re: Inito 9100A SCSI CARD COMPILING PROBLEMS (Alan Fried)
  Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? (Raphael Mankin)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Kent Robotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to change permission bit on vfat partition?
Date: 21 Feb 1999 17:37:03 GMT

Te-Cheng Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, there
>     I have a problem about chmod.

>     I installed both Win95 and RedHat 5.2 on two different hd.
>     Now I try to enable the permission bit on my vfat partition so that
> ALL users can read and write on that partition. I issued this command

> chmod -R a+rwx /mnt/e

>     Unfortunately, the permission is always       rwxr-xr-x, how can I
> enable the write permission bit on vfat partition?

> Thanks

> Shen

> email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mount the vfat partition like this.

mount -t vfat -o defaults,user,umask=002,gid=100,unhide,quiet /dev/hda1 /mnt/e

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Linux suxxxx
Date: 20 Feb 1999 15:08:20 GMT

I would be willing to bet my left eye this guy is a Windows user.

In article <7aigvo$gu5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The Seeker wrote:
>My opinion is that :
>
>Anyone who is comparing linux to windows and windows to linux is a moron !
>(no hard feelings guys!).
>
>For me, the os is a tool. And windows and linux are totally different tools.
>Would you ever use a screwdriver as a hammer or a hammer as a screwdriver ?
>I dont think so.......
>
>In the end, it always depends on what are the requirements the user has from
>his machine....... If you know what you want, then you already know what is
>best for you. But plz dont speak for the others .....
>
>ps
>if one uses windows and he is happy, then he is happy ; what do u care ?
>if one uses linux and he is happy, then he is happy too ; what do u care ?
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Upali Bandara)
Subject: c++ compiler
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:10:21 +0100

I even installed the whole RedHat distribution, but trying to compile a
program like hello.C with   gcc hello.C   an error message is saying
that iostream.h contains errors - much errors. I capitulated.

Samuel

------------------------------

From: Doug Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: [Q] Serial Communication software for UNIX
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 09:11:10 -0600

On 20 Feb 1999, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> I used to use a software program to do serial communication between the Sun
> Sparc running Solaris and a Motorola 68K board that I built.  Now I've
> forgotten the name of the software and couldn't seem to find it.
> Someone told me it's a software that was standard on Sun Sparc Solaris.
> 
> I know it's not minicom or kermit or seyon.  I like the software for its
> upload/download features which worked the first time I tried it.
> 
> Would appreciate if anyone could refresh my memory on this.  
> Don't you hate it when you forget something like this.
> 
> Thanks for any tips. :-)
> 

The only built-in serial comm program that I can infer you are talking
about is 'tip'. Yes, it has primitive upload/download capability as long
as you're only transferring a text file or equivalent. Is this the one
you're talking about?

____________________________________________________________________________
Doug Hughes                                     Engineering Network Services
System/Net Admin                                Auburn University
                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 23:16:47 +0800
From: William Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: How to add libstdc++.so.2.9 to slackware 3.6

Hi there,

I found that my app (KDE) now need the following library
libstdc++.so.2.9.

How can I add this back to slackware. First I don't remember whether I
have omitted this during the first time installation.
and now I don't even know where to download the library.

Could anyone pls shed some light on this.

Thks in advance.

William

------------------------------

From: "Ken Abrahamsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Please help with unconventional RedHat install....
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 10:11:10 -0800

Yes, go to RH's site. You'll want 'rawrite' and the boot.img (maybe
'supp.img' too) files to make a boot disk. Also consider using loadlin (sp?)
for booting from diskette rather than lilo.
ken
================================
Brian Wainscott wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Is there any way to install RedHat without the supplied boot disk?  Or
>is there some way to build my own RedHat boot disk?
>
>I've got a machine with an NCR 53c876 SCSI adapter, which is not
>currently supported.  However, I THINK the 53c875 support would work but
>that the driver just doesn't recognize the card.  I want to try playing
>with that driver.  However, I can't install anything because that is the
>only disk controller on the machine.
>
>So, I'd like to build a RedHat 5.2 install boot disk with a modified
>driver on it.
>
>How?  I can't even mount the normal boot disk on a different machine.
>
>Alternately, the machine is running WinNT -- is there any way that would
>be helpful?  Like creating a disk image and using loadln (which I've
>never used) to boot off of it?  Then how do I build a good disk image?
>(Well, I guess if I knew that, I could just put it on a floppy and skip
>NT anyway.....)
>
>Thanks for suggestions/pointers!
>
>--
>Brian Wainscott |    No Jesus ---> No Peace
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Know Jesus ---> Know Peace



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Scary, no?
Date: 20 Feb 1999 15:22:00 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 00:43:27 +0000, Steve Gage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Mark J. Straka" wrote:
>
>> There are over 16 thousand messages in this and other similar groups
>> (comp.os.linux.setup; etc), but precious few "answers" to these pleas
>> for help!
>> Cool patience seems to be crucial. |:^{
>
>I don't agree with your "precious few answers". If 15,900 of the
>questions are the same as the other 100 over and over (which seems to be
>the case), then 100 answers should do it. As someone who is moveing from
>newbie status over to semi-capable, I find that many of the questions
>posed could be answered by even a cursory attempt at looking at the
>online documentation. Some people try, and then ask for help, and they
>get it, but there are a lot of questions that are just the same ol'
>FAQ's, and are answered there. A little bit of self-reliance seems to be
>crucial :-)
>
I agree with you Steve.

There sure seems to be an aversion for people to use any kind of search
mechanism.  Even if people don't know about http://www.dejanews.com, they
surely have heard about other search engines.

It doesn't seem anyone even reads any of the files that came on their CD
if that is what they have.

There have only been a couple of instances were the problem I was having
have not been discussed in the past.

-- 
Frank Hahn

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Fried)
Subject: Re: Inito 9100A SCSI CARD COMPILING PROBLEMS
Date: 20 Feb 1999 15:46:18 GMT

Jose Urena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Guessing that you have a PCI or AGP card
>
>Are you sharing IRQs with your video card?
>what video card do you have?
>
I have an STB128 AGP Video
card. 

How would I know if I was sharing Irqs?

Thanx in advance

Alan

------------------------------

From: Raphael Mankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.x,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: 21 Feb 1999 14:30:27 GMT

In comp.os.linux.misc Jason Clifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Doodle wrote:

:> I know Win95/98 has support for Multilink PPP to 'channel bond' two
:> V90 modems to gain something like 10k/sec connection speeds. Can I use
:> two V90s in Linux to get 10k/sec connection speeds?

: Yes. You need to build support for this into the kernel and read the
: documentation that accompanies the kernel with regard to this facility.

And before this you will also need to speak to your ISP to make
sure that they will support this.

-- 
==================================
                                        2 + 2 = 5 (for large values of 2)
Raphael Mankin
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==================================

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to