Linux-Misc Digest #936, Volume #19 Fri, 23 Apr 99 22:13:10 EDT
Contents:
Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code (Steve Mading)
Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code ("Fabian")
Re: Stack size limit (Bernhard Brueck)
IP Aliasing kernel support ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: how to mount SCSI cdrom, SCSI Zip and floppy under kde ? (diahedrial)
Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code (Steve Mading)
Re: CD-R filesystems (brian moore)
Re: dial-up problems via PPP ("Thomas H. Smith")
MS Schedule+ ("Steve D. Perkins")
Re: Suse Linux 6.1 and pppd ("Thomas H. Smith")
HTACCESS HELP! (Michael)
Re: ppp-on (diahedrial)
Re: Second NIC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
nfs sunos <--> linux (Kevin E. Cosgrove)
Re: Windows NTDETECT (diahedrial)
Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code ("Phlip")
Re: Linux Book Recommendations please??
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Mading)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code
Date: 23 Apr 1999 22:59:56 GMT
Fabian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Allegedly, cloning a male into a female is theoretically possible, but not
: female to male. It has to do with teh fact taht a female zygote lacks a Y
: chromosome, while in a male zygote, all taht is needed is to replace teh Y
: with a extra duplicate of the X.
Aren't all males just mutated females? (start out female at first in
the womb and then 'sex change' as they develop) I can't remember where
I heard that, and it could just be layman's stupidity. But if that's
true, shouldn't it be easier to go from female to male, since it happens
roughly 50% of the time in nature anyway?
------------------------------
From: "Fabian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 00:43:23 +0100
Steve Mading wrote in message <7fqu1c$br6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Fabian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>: Allegedly, cloning a male into a female is theoretically possible, but
not
>: female to male. It has to do with teh fact taht a female zygote lacks a Y
>: chromosome, while in a male zygote, all taht is needed is to replace teh
Y
>: with a extra duplicate of the X.
>
>Aren't all males just mutated females? (start out female at first in
>the womb and then 'sex change' as they develop) I can't remember where
>I heard that, and it could just be layman's stupidity. But if that's
>true, shouldn't it be easier to go from female to male, since it happens
>roughly 50% of the time in nature anyway?
The masculinisation of a foetus is caused by testosterone. If you have a
handy foetus and a womb handy, try injecting a female foetus with lots of
testosterone, and it will develop as male from then on. Unfortunately, teh
reverse isnt true. Once masculinisation of a foetus has begun, it cant be
reversed simply by removing the testosterone source, although it may be
slowed down by teh absence of the same.
And no, Virginia, high doses of oestrogen wont feminise a male foetus, it
will abort the foetus.
Males are essentially mutated females, but like anything else in nature, it
is extremely difficult (read: impossible) to reverse.
---
Fabian
Rule One: Question the unquestionable,
ask the unaskable, eff the ineffable,
think the unthinkable, and screw the inscrutable.
------------------------------
From: Bernhard Brueck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development
Subject: Re: Stack size limit
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:03:41 GMT
In comp.os.linux.development Van Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to be able to increase the stack size limit. The amount depends
> on the size of the memory of the machine, and on the tasks I'll be running.
> I can set the stack size in tcsh with the "limit stacksize" command, but
> can increase it only if I'm root. Or, I can re-compile the kernel.
...
> Is it silly to consider doing this in init?
Yes
> If not, can somebody refer me to a good part of init in which to do it?
/etc/profile
Bernhard
--
=================================
Bernhard Brueck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Aliasing kernel support
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 19:44:23 GMT
Hi,
I have just updated the kernel from 2.0.36 which came with redhat linux 5.2,
to Kernel 2.2.6. So far so good, everything works fine, except I want to
enable ip aliasing for vws support. I have enabled ip_alias in the networking
options under the kernel config. But when I boot up, I get this error
message:-
Error
No Kernel support for aliasingStarting portmapper: portmapper
Does anyone know what this means? I presume that I have missed something in
the kernel config :(
Cheers,
- Trevor
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: diahedrial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: how to mount SCSI cdrom, SCSI Zip and floppy under kde ?
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:50:41 -0700
Alexei Stapinski wrote:
>
> "James C. McPherson" wrote:
> >
> > "marc*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > and
> > > mount -t ??? /dev/sda4 /mnt/zip
> >
> > here you're trying to mount partition 4 of block device /dev/sda. If you
> > actually want to mount your zip disk, check which device it actually is and
> > then use that device name instead of /dev/sda4. As for fstype, no idea.
>
> VFAT is generally accepted (and usually the default filesystem on ZIP
> disks), it's a decent enough filesystem for the size of a ZIP disk, and
> Windows boxes will love it.
VFAT works great for pre-formatted zip disks...
> marc, to find out what dev to use, use
>
> fdisk /dev/sda
>
> or on whatever dev your ZIP drive is detected as (dmesg is great for
> this). Use p to print out the partition table, take note of what
> partitions are there. For me, oddly enough, it also is partition 4,
> /dev/sda4. It's the only partition on the drive too *SHRUG*. Use q to
> quit fdisk, and try mount again with the proper
> info.
dmesg will work, if you have a zip disk in the drive on boot-up.
All pre-formatted zip disks use partition 4, (why?? I don't know)
so whatever the device, (/dev/sd[abc...]4) it will be the fourth
partition. You can also fdisk the zip disk, delete the existing
partitions, and create a single primary partition and then format
it ext2, (Linux native format) and use the disks that way, works
great, keeps file permissions, etc...
> If you mount ZIP disks frequently, you should edit fstab and add the ZIP
> drive line at the end:
>
> /dev/sda4 /mnt/zip vfat noauto
> 0 0
>
> So you can mount and umount easily by using just "mount /mnt/zip"
>
> GL
> Alexei Stapinski
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Mading)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code
Date: 24 Apr 1999 00:17:14 GMT
Fabian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Steve Mading wrote in message <7fqu1c$br6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
: >Fabian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: >
: >: Allegedly, cloning a male into a female is theoretically possible, but
: not
: >: female to male. It has to do with teh fact taht a female zygote lacks a Y
: >: chromosome, while in a male zygote, all taht is needed is to replace teh
: Y
: >: with a extra duplicate of the X.
: >
: >Aren't all males just mutated females? (start out female at first in
: >the womb and then 'sex change' as they develop) I can't remember where
: >I heard that, and it could just be layman's stupidity. But if that's
: >true, shouldn't it be easier to go from female to male, since it happens
: >roughly 50% of the time in nature anyway?
[snip]
: Males are essentially mutated females, but like anything else in nature, it
: is extremely difficult (read: impossible) to reverse.
Very carefully re-read what you said up above in the post I was
responding to. It's the opposite of what you are saying now.
I'm confused.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Subject: Re: CD-R filesystems
Date: 24 Apr 1999 00:41:43 GMT
On 23 Apr 1999 14:57:57 GMT,
Rod Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Posted and mailed]
Please stop doing that.
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> jik- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> FWIW, if you use mkhybrid rather than mkisofs, it's also possible to
> >> create a CD that includes Joliet, Rock Ridge, and MacOS's HFS, all in one.
> >> This can be very handy sometimes.
> >
> > Oh, so these filesystems can all coexist on the same CD in the same
> > space,...talking about the same files? Is there anything that would
> > make this unreadable on other operating systems?
>
> Yes, they can all exist on one CD, pointing to the same files. I've just
> posted a more elaborate response to Brian Moore giving theoretical
> details (he seems to have been under some mistaken impressions about
> what's possible in mixing these filesystems).
Indeed, all sorts of things are possible: but irrelevant as mkisofs
doesn't do it.
You can abuse features of things like MS-DOS which displays only the
first volume of a multi-session disk to have precisely the effect you
describe of showing a completely different set of files than what you'd
see on a Windows machine or a Unix machine for that matter.
But mkisofs doesn't do that, so it's irrelevant.
The typical Joliet CD-ROM is quite readable on a non-Joliet System.
(Just as my earlier example, a vfat disk with long filenames is very
much readble on a plain-old-fat system, but with some name munging.)
All that mkisofs does is write an alternative directory, which is what
I said it did.
> AFAIK, mixing all three filesystems won't make a CD unreadable by any OS,
> so long as that OS can read at least one of the filesystems. It wouldn't
> surprise me if there were a buggy CD driver somewhere, for some OS, that
> would run into problems with a triple-mode CD, however. I've not
> encountered this with DOS, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT, OS/2,
> MacOS, or Linux, however, so at least one driver set for each of those
> OSes can cope well with such combination CDs.
You haven't deal with Mac files much, eh? The Mac -must- mount the CD
as HFS in order to get a program file off it. It can't read programs
(and some data files) off a plain old iso9660 because information about
the file is lost. This is truly a new filesystem in that a whole set
of extra attributes are included with files, as opposed to Joliet which
just gives an alternative index much like vfat does for "long filename
support".
It's also very easy to confuse MS-DOS, since the stock MS-DOS
implementation shows the first directory it finds instead of the last
as mentioned earlier. It would take some tweaking of mkisofs to do
that, though.
Theoretical details are a fine thing, but completely pointless in this
discussion regarding how mkisofs and mkhybrid work.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
------------------------------
From: "Thomas H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: dial-up problems via PPP
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 20:58:12 GMT
Try checking out; http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
XsAndOs wrote in message ...
>It may be that the PNP is the problem. If there are jumpers on the modem
try
>hardware setting the modem to an open com port and irq. This fixed my modem
>response problem on a pnp zoom modem.
>
>The Good Guy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>Hello,
>> Not too long ago I successfully installed RedHat Linux 5.1... which
>>comes with kernel 2.0.34. I am having problems setting up an internet
>>connection through PPP. Now, I have HAD this exact same copy of Linux on
------------------------------
From: "Steve D. Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MS Schedule+
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 20:07:53 -0400
I'm trying to figure out a way to use the shared schedule at the
office (I'm a tech at a computer shop, and the secretaries share a MS
Schedule+ schedule to make appointments for all of us)... preferable
without having to resort to a "cop out" like VNC. I have the only Linux
box on the network... everyone else uses Win9x boxes (though I've got us
all tied in together using Samba).
Anyone know of any Linux apps that can read/write to MS Schedule+?
Steve
------------------------------
From: "Thomas H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Suse Linux 6.1 and pppd
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 21:03:40 GMT
Check this out: http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
Zoltan Kis wrote in message <7fn2di$d5r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>i have a problem to connect to my ISP. I tried wvdial (and Kppp) to connect
>to
>my ISP. I got a connect and the message that pppd 2.3. is starting but
>nothing
>more happens. I still tried to enable the modem with YAST -> Network
>Configuration as Modem PPP but it doesnt work.
>thnx in advance
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HTACCESS HELP!
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 20:55:20 GMT
I am trying to setup a secure web server with RH5.1, Apache 1.2 and RH Secure
Web Server module. Also utilizing HTACCESS for directory security. After
implementing RH Secure Web Server module, htaccess stops working. Some how,
httpsd disable htaccess on my web server.
Any suggestion on this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for
reading.
Michael
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: diahedrial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp-on
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:51:58 -0700
"D. Vrabel" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In article <7feg6q$vud$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lian PL) wrote:
> > > My ppp-on does not work. When I key in the command ppp-on ,bash says
> > > command not found.
> >
> > > Could it be the path problem.
> > You can check your PATH variable, if you type : set <Enter>
> > If you see in the line (beginning with PATH) that /usr/local/bin:
> > is there (where your 'ppp-on' file resides), then it should run...
> Just a small tip:
> Since there are many variables try
> set|grep PATH
> to get only the PATH line.
echo $PATH
will display your current PATH environment variable...
-diahedrial
> David
> --
> David Vrabel
> Engineering Undergraduate at University of Cambridge, UK.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Second NIC
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 21:00:36 GMT
I've just been working on the same issue and have managed to get RH 5.1 to at
least recognize the 2nd NIC.
To get to this point, you will have to do the following.
1. In X, on the control panel, start up the package manager.
2. Under Installed Packages, select Available and make sure the dist. CD is
mounted
3. From the Base folder, install the kernel headers and kernel source
4. From the Development/libraies/lic folder, install glibc and glibc-devel
5. From the Development/building folder, install make
6. From the Development/languages folder, install bin86 and gcc
7. That's about another 50Mb of files and I think that's all the extra's
8. change to the linux source directory -- cd /usr/src/linux
9. now bring up the configurator -- make xconfig (or the manual way -- make
config)
10. select network options and select the appropriate options
11. select network devices and select the NICs
12. close the Linux Kernel Configuration window
13. update the makefile -- make dep, then -- make clean
14. build the new kernel -- make
15. build a compressed image -- make zImage
16. change directory to source of new image -- cd arch/i386/boot
17. look in the directory for a file named zImage
18. copy this file to the boot directory -- cp zImage /boot/vmlinuz.new
19. change to the lilo config directory -- cd /etc
20. edit the lilo.conf file and add the following lines
image=/boot/vmlinuz.new
label=new (or whatever you wish to call it)
root=/dev/hda1 (or whatever your boot device is)
read-only
21. run lilo to update.. should see "Added new" (or what you labelled it)
22. ensure lilo prompts for OS to boot (see lilo man on how this is done)
23. shutdown and reboot. At lilo prompt, enter "new" (or your label)
24. should boot with dual NICs.
Now if only I can find out why I get a "region already allocated error
@0x0300" for the 2nd NICs IO address. Changed it to several addresses but
still the same message.
Good Luck.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin E. Cosgrove)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nfs sunos <--> linux
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 01:27:30 GMT
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Sun3/50 running SunOS 4.1.1_U1 to be able to
NFS mount my Redhat 5.1 Linux filesystems. I've exported each
system to the other. I can mount the Sun3 from the Linux box.
I can get the Sun3 to NFS mount itself. I can't get the Sun3 to
mount the Linux box. When I try, I get this error:
mount: linux:/ server not responding: RPC: Program not registered
mount: backgrounding
/linux
Any one have any suggestions for how I should proceed to
troubleshoot and/or fix this?
Thanks much...
--
Kevin.E.Cosgrove AT Tek.COM
Change the AT in my reply-to address to send e-mail.
Unless otherwise noted, the statements herein reflect my personal
opinions and not those of any organization with which I may be affiliated.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3E 70 6A 31 3A E8 24 08 9A A2 29 7E 6E 61 D5 F4
------------------------------
From: diahedrial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup
Subject: Re: Windows NTDETECT
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:24:15 -0700
My recommendation: First, make sure you have a floppy that can boot
Linux, then, boot off the NT install boot floppies and choose the
"repair" option, (you do have your emergency repair disk, right?),
and in the repair options, just have it repair the boot files.
Hopefully that will get your NT install booting again... and maybe
the win95 as well. Then, if you want to use LILO for the multi-boot,
boot off the Linux boot floppy, check your /etc/lilo.conf then re-run
/sbin/lilo and when you reboot, you should have a lilo prompt and
be able to boot Linux, or NT, if you choose NT, it should give you
the option of booting win95. Also... you can use NT's boot loader
to boot linux as well as NT. Just setup your /etc/lilo.conf file
to install in the linux root partition, instead of the MBR, then
use "dd" to write out the boot file for NT's loader, like this:
dd if=/dev/hda3 of=/mnt/c_drive/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1
(this assumes that the linux root partition is "/dev/hda3", and
that your "C:\" drive is mounted under "/c_drive", adjust acording
to your setup...). Anyway, then just edit the "C:\boot.ini" file
and add a line at the bottom:
Linux = C:\bootsect.lnx
and reboot, Linux will show up in NT's boot menu, select it and
boot Linux, I've been booting win95/NT4.0/Linux via NT's bootloader
for years... (your mileage may very) Hope this has been of some help,
-diahedrial
Paul Blaylock wrote:
>
> Sounds like a real mess! I dont really understand enought about these things
> to offer a solution but I have set up a few dual boot systems so maybe some
> of what I have learned will help.
>
> AFAIK the 1024 cylinder bit is fairly crucial when booting operating
> systems, in that the bios will not look past 1024 cyclinders for the boot
> partition.
>
> I looked at installing linux dual boot with NT and it looked pretty daunting
> the procedures involved in making the boot sequence work. The one thing I
> did pick up was that the NT boot loader likes to control things so you
> should avoid messing with it! (I got around this by installing linux and not
> letting it install Lilo, I boot linux from a floppy which works fine and is
> no slower than booting NT off HDD).
>
> If it comes to a reinstall I would install windows95 then NT so that the NT
> boot loader is in charge. Install Linux and boot that from a floppy
>
> Justyn Bridge wrote in message <7f7e30$1e6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Have got myself in quite a sticky situation. This quite a long story but
> >feel if anyone can help i will have to put in as much info as i can so
> >please bare with me.
> >
> >I have got Win95b and WinNT 4 WS station installed om my PC. A few weeks
> ago
> >my PC started booting straight into 95 with out giving me the WinNT
> NTLoader
> >menu. It didn't bother me much at the time as i didn't have any use for NT.
> >However i have now created a network between 2 PC's and would like to be
> >able to WinNT again. I have always wanted Linux on my PC and from what i
> had
> >read up about it, i could get 95, NT and Linux to boot up from the Linux
> >menu. So i installed Redhat 5.2 and tried to get Lilo ( Linux command
> >promt ) to see my NT boot sector. Uhh,uhh - no way. When trying to boot
> into
> >NT from Lilo i got tis error message ( A kernal file is missing from the
> >disk. Insert a system diskette and restart the system ) So that didn't work
> >although i could get to 95 from Lilo. Hokay, not so bad, more or less the
> >same situation i was in before installing Linux. So i decided to use the NT
> >repair disk option and go through the repair, During the repair i get this
> >huge message explaining that setup has determined that one or more of your
> >hard disks has more than 1024 cylinders. ( Not to sure about my cylinders
> >side of things - however at the end of this message it states "This message
> >does not necessarily indicate and error condition. It is intended to alert
> >you to the fact that one or more of your hard disks may actually be larger
> >than the size for which it is currently configured.
> >
> >Right, so i read up on this and find that a DOS utility called Bootpart can
> >repair my WinNT boot sector - nice one! Try to repair it - all seems okay,
> >cross my fingers and then reboot the PC hoping that NT menu will appear or
> i
> >will beable to get to it from Lilo.l What happens, I get an error message
> >NTDETECT Failed and the PC hangs. So now no 95 no NT but linux is ok.
> >However when using the 95 startup disk, i can see al my files no prob and
> >using NTFSDOS i can see all my NT files. I tried to boot 95 from DOS and
> >got this error message." Registry file was not found. Registry services may
> >be inoperative for this session. XMS cache problem. Registry service may be
> >inoperative. A device or resource required by VFAT is not present or is
> >unavailable. VFAT cannot continue loading. System halted".
> >
> >Pretty screwed huh!!! I am going to try and replace NTDTECT.COM this
> weekend
> >and NTLDR. But it's looking pretty grim for any recovery. I appreciate
> >anyone reading this huge posting and if you have the slightest hint/tip or
> >any info - i will be most greatful.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: "Phlip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code
Date: 23 Apr 1999 18:32:21 PDT
Someone wrote:
>Criminally Insane Programmers Are Attracted To Open Source Code
Your point being...?
--
Phlip at politizen dot com (address munged)
======= http://users.deltanet.com/~tegan/home.html =======
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux Book Recommendations please??
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 01:18:23 +1000
Michael Powe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this household, it's a "widely known and accepted fact" that I've
> compiled several kernels on this Slack 3.5 box, up to and including
> 2.2.0 -- and I've done some of them more than once, to add/subtract
> options. I've had no problems.
> (Linux 2.2.0) [/home/michael/source]
Linux 2.2.0 is not a 2.0 kernel
cya
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
