Linux-Misc Digest #250, Volume #27 Wed, 28 Feb 01 08:13:02 EST
Contents:
setting up HP LaserJet using Emulex NETJet print server on Linux ("John Gill")
Unable to mount...08:32 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support (Peter Seebach)
Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Figured it out (DHCPD problem)! ("Tom Edelbrok")
alt.internet.p2p (peer-to-peer) newsgroup created (Jonathan Grobe)
cs89x0 2.4.0 problems (suri)
Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support ("Telford C Chuck")
Cross-platform development tool? (Jari Huovila)
SAMBA & user groups ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: X Server questions ("Wayne Howarth")
Re: X Server questions ("Wayne Howarth")
Re: red-carpet for redhat (Fabrice Colin)
Re: Cross-platform development tool? (Robert Heller)
Re: Looking for free Terminal Emulator ("Nils O. Sel�sdal")
Re: Unable to mount...08:32 (Robert Jones)
iPaq + Pocketlinux -> le bon plan ???? ("Nicolas Rubin")
Re: Installing windows 2000 ("Jack Kaufmann")
Re: Installing windows 2000 ("Jack Kaufmann")
Filter text strings from binaries ("Adam Warner")
Re: Cross-platform development tool? ("Nils O. Sel�sdal")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "John Gill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.redhat,alt.comp.hardware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions,linux.samba
Subject: setting up HP LaserJet using Emulex NETJet print server on Linux
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:15:32 GMT
I think I am about ready to toss this NETJet card out the window. I cannot
for the life of me configure this device to print to my HP4+ from RedHat
Linux 7.0, using the printtool menus. I have read the Emulex manual, the
Red Hat HOWTO and a nice write-up at www.linuxnewbie.org , but still no
luck.
If anyone has some first hand experience at this, please let me know. I
think the trick is to set it up as an lpd printer, which Linux will think is
on another Linux host, but I have not succeeded yet.
Thanks,
-- John
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unable to mount...08:32
Date: 28 Feb 2001 05:51:19 GMT
I've had my first major crash of RH6.1. Found a bare X window screen, the X
'moire' and a cursor, instead of the default Red Hat xdm screen. Tried to
reboot, and everything hung when trying to mount NFS. Tried rescue boot,
and hung at these error messages:
VFS: Cannot open root device 08:32
Kernel Panic:VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:32
What is "08:32"?
looks like I'm in for a fresh install (no backups, unfortunately; my
floppy-IF Travan tape device isn't recognized). Anyone recommend a
compatible backup medium for Red Hat Linux?)
===========================================
John Meshkoff johnm at sivakalpa dot org
remove 'johnpipe' in 'From:' to reply
http://www.sivakalpa.org/johnpipe/
"I do not know that I know the self fully,
neither do I know that I know him not"
...from the Upanishads
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win2000.hardware
Subject: Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
Date: 28 Feb 2001 06:11:42 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just found out the hard way that you do not support your INI-9100UW
>SCSI adapter under Windows 2000. I am dumbfounded by your decision to
>not support this product under Windows 2000.
Why? Huge development cost, and *ZERO* sales. They aren't selling this
card anymore; why should they write drivers for it now?
Anyway, if you want to blame someone, blame the folks who decided that they
needed to invent a brand new, incompatible, driver model for their "new"
system.
-s
--
Copyright 2001, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C/Unix wizard, Pro-commerce radical, Spam fighter. Boycott Spamazon!
Consulting & Computers: http://www.plethora.net/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win2000.hardware
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:32:16 GMT
And no more posting into the wrong newsgroups!
In comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Dave Uhring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it will cost you and your company less to discard your incompatible OS
> and switch to Linux, BSD or Solaris. No more seat licenses, no more
> scheduled "restarts", no more blue screens of death.
> Dave
> Tim Buck wrote:
>> I sent this to Initio a few minutes ago. I thought some of you might be
>> interested in it.
>>
>> ===== begin rant =====
>> I just found out the hard way that you do not support your INI-9100UW
>> SCSI adapter under Windows 2000. I am dumbfounded by your decision to
>> not support this product under Windows 2000.
>>
>> For a company who appears to pride themselves on their cross-platform
>> support, who provides drivers for their hardware for (most) Windows
>> platforms, Linux, BSD, MacOS, UnixWare, and Solaris, the reasoning
>> behind this decision to abandon the 9100UW is unfathomable.
>>
>> I understand and agree that you should not be producing the 9100UW
>> anymore -- Ultra 2 SCSI, LVD, and all the other latest buzzwords make
>> Ultra Wide SCSI obsolete now. I have no problem with that; I do have a
>> problem with you forcing your customers to discard perfectly good,
>> functioning hardware, simply because they wish to upgrade their
>> operating system. You're the only company I've seen do this; for
>> example, I have yet to find a network card for which there's no Windows
>> 2000 driver.
>>
>> What's especially galling about your decision is that you consider the
>> 9100UW an "end of life" product which you no longer support, yet it's
>> still for sale in your online store, as of today!
>>
>> Our company first began buying Initio SCSI adapters as a low-cost,
>> high-performance alternative to expensive Adaptec adapters. We will no
>> longer do so because of your ridiculous decision. It would cost you very
>> little in development time to port your existing Windows NT 4.0 driver
>> over to Windows 2000; it will cost you a lot in lost future sales
>> because you haven't done so.
>>
>> Timothy Buck
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
------------------------------
From: "Tom Edelbrok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Figured it out (DHCPD problem)!
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:05:46 GMT
For anyone else's reference here is how I solved my DHCPCD problem using a
DSL high-speed internet line.
I have two NIC's and Redhat 6.0. One NIC is the external interface, the
other is the internal LAN interface. I would be able to obtain an internet
IP address only about 20% of the time. The rest of the time it just sits
there and times out at bootup. I tried two different NIC cards (a 3COM 3C509
and a Linksys LNE100) with the same results on both.
Then I noticed in a web search that someone else had the same problem. What
you do to fix it is edit "/sbin/ifdown" to include these lines directly
after where you have replaced "pump" with "dhcpcd -k":
rm /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-${DEVICE}.cache 2>null
rm /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-${DEVICE}.info 2>null
It seems that if you leave these files hanging around at shutdown time then
you won't be able to get a DHCP request served successfully at boot time,
(you would get a "DHCP_NAK Server response received: requested address not
available"). I don't know why the "dhcpcd -k" in "/sbin/ifdown" doesn't
remove these files at shutdown time but I know the solution outlined above
works well. Now I get an IP address 100% of the time.
Tom
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Grobe)
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.python,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.tcp-ip
Subject: alt.internet.p2p (peer-to-peer) newsgroup created
Date: 28 Feb 2001 08:21:44 GMT
Reply-To: <>
Subject: alt.internet.p2p (peer-to-peer) newsgroup created
Followup-To: alt.internet.p2p
alt.internet.p2p has just been created for discussion of p2p
(peer-to-peer) applications on the internet.
Quoting Clay Shirky:
"P2P is a class of applications that takes advantage of resources --
storage, cycles, content, human presence -- available at the edges of
the Internet. Because accessing these decentralized resources means
operating in an environment of unstable connectivity and unpredictable
IP addresses, P2P nodes must operate outside the DNS system and have
significant or total autonomy from central servers.
...
If you're looking for a litmus test for P2P, this is it: 1) Does it
treat variable connectivity and temporary network addresses as the
norm, and 2) does it give the nodes at the edges of the network
significant autonomy? If the answer to both of those questions is yes,
the application is P2P. If the answer to either question is no, it's not
P2P."
These applications include file sharing such as Napster and Gnutella,
instant messaging such as ICQ, distributed computing such as SETI@home.
Many news administrators only add new alt.* groups on user request. So if
it is not available at your site ask your news administrator to add it:
Write to him at the address news or usenet at your site or to the
technical support people there (address: support)). Because of the
poor propagation of new alt groups it will be a while before a
significant amount of traffic shows up.
--
Jonathan Grobe
------------------------------
From: suri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cs89x0 2.4.0 problems
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:40:17 +0530
Iam facing some problem with cs89x0 driver in 2.4.0
here are the details.
I use cs8920 as my NIC.
When i tried to use 2.4.0, the following error messge could be seen.
eth0: EEPROM is configured for unavailable media
The code between lines cs89x0.c 1127-1136 seems to be causing problems.
when i try the options
io=0x360 debug=1 irq=10 media=rj45
lp->adapter_cnf takes value of 0x63 which is fine.
But the lines of code in cs89x0.h
#define A_CNF_10B_T 0x0001
386 #define A_CNF_AUI 0x0002
387 #define A_CNF_10B_2 0x0004
388 #define A_CNF_MEDIA_TYPE 0x0060
389 #define A_CNF_MEDIA_AUTO 0x0000
390 #define A_CNF_MEDIA_10B_T 0x0020
391 #define A_CNF_MEDIA_AUI 0x0040
392 #define A_CNF_MEDIA_10B_2 0x0060
makes the control to switch to 1131, which means the media is BNC, but
not true and result becomes 0. And prints error at 1135.
I feel it is because of the reason that A_CNF_TYPE and A_CNF_MEDIA_10B_2
both are defined to be 0x0060
Any suggestions please
Thanks in advance
Suresh
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Telford C Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Telford C Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.periphs.scsi,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win2000.hardware
Subject: Re: Initio's lack of Windows 2000 support
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:44:39 GMT
The F**king driver is included on the Win2k disk. I am using that model scsi
card and it performs better than the new 2936. You've got other problems.
"Peter Seebach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:3a9c969e$0$26817$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >I just found out the hard way that you do not support your INI-9100UW
> >SCSI adapter under Windows 2000. I am dumbfounded by your decision to
> >not support this product under Windows 2000.
>
> Why? Huge development cost, and *ZERO* sales. They aren't selling this
> card anymore; why should they write drivers for it now?
>
> Anyway, if you want to blame someone, blame the folks who decided that
they
> needed to invent a brand new, incompatible, driver model for their "new"
> system.
>
> -s
> --
> Copyright 2001, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> C/Unix wizard, Pro-commerce radical, Spam fighter. Boycott Spamazon!
> Consulting & Computers: http://www.plethora.net/
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jari Huovila)
Subject: Cross-platform development tool?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:49:58 GMT
Hi everyone!
There wouldn't happen to be any software development IDE (C++ / Java)
that would be able to produce binaries for Linux, MacOS and Windows
from the same source code?
Thanks!
- Jari
P.S. Has anyone got experience of CodeWarrior? Is it worth nothing?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SAMBA & user groups
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:20:20 GMT
Hi,
I have problems accessing SAMBA directories with group users.
The owner is root, the group is mygroup and I am part of mygroup.
Access rights are 770.
In the linux terminal, everything works fine, but when I try to access
it over SAMBA, it doesn't work.
The directory is not public, valid users = +@mygroup.
It works when I am the owner of the directory or when rights are 777.
It seems that SAMBA isn't checking the group rights?
Is there anyone familiar with this?
Thx.
------------------------------
From: "Wayne Howarth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X Server questions
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:41:54 -0000
Thanks for your reply.
> Then there are the widget sets, these are libraries that contain the
> widgets (e. g. menus, buttons, checkboxes, edit fields ...). The GNOME
> environment uses GTK+, KDE uses Qt.
Are these the libraries that are used by the Desktop Manager to display
buttons, etc?
Should I wish to do some development in the future, I guess I'd not need to
be concerned what visual objects (e.g. buttons, windows) would look like
when run under another window manager, but that I'd simply create them using
the environment that I would be working under?? I seem to remember in the
past that although I used the 'twm' (?) window manager, by using various
libraries applications could be made to have 'Motif like' characteristics.
Regards,
Wayne.
------------------------------
From: "Wayne Howarth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X Server questions
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:48:07 -0000
Lew,
Your reply was much appreciated. Thanks.
In the following diagram am I right in thinking that although you are
sitting at 'mysystem', the WM and DM are physically located on different
machines? Presumably your application running remotely on 'appsystem' would
make use of the X Server on the same machine, but that the X Server would
send all output to 'mysystem'... is this what the
DISPLAY = <machine>
environment variable is used for?
Finally how would the X Server running on 'appsystem' know to use the WM and
DM on the other two machines.
Once again thanks,
Wayne.
> TCP/IP network
> ------------------------------------------
> / / / \
> | | | |
> +-----------+ +-----------+ +----------+ +----------+
> | appsystem | | wmsystem | | dmsystem | | mysystem |
> +-----------+ +-----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +- monitor
> | xload app | | FVWM95 wm | | GNOME dm | | X server |-+- keybd
> +-----------+ +-----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +- mouse
>
> I can sit at "mysystem", and run an X client application on
> "appsystem" which will display it's windows on "mysystem". Further,
> those windows will have window controls provided by the FVWM95 window
> manager running on "wmsystem" and drag'n'drop facilities provided by
> the GNOME desktop manager running on "dmsystem". "appsystem" does not
> need a local X server, neither does "wmsystem" or "dmsystem".
------------------------------
From: Fabrice Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: red-carpet for redhat
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:34:02 +0000
>From http://www.ximian.com/, Red Carpet is the "next generation Ximian
updater and software management application".
It's not Debian only. At the moment it supports both RPM and DEB based
systems.
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Ahmad Al-rasheedan writes:
> > Is red-carpet for Debian based distros. only?
>
> What is 'red-carpet'?
------------------------------
From: Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cross-platform development tool?
Date: 28 Feb 2001 06:00:16 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jari Huovila),
In a message on Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:49:58 GMT, wrote :
JH> Hi everyone!
JH>
JH> There wouldn't happen to be any software development IDE (C++ / Java)
JH> that would be able to produce binaries for Linux, MacOS and Windows
JH> from the same source code?
I've built Tcl loadable shared libraries (DLLs for MS-Windows) under
Linux for both Linux and MS-Windows from the same sources. I used the
native G++ (egcs) and the mingw32 package with egcs. My 'IDE':
Microemacs 3.10 & make. I used xf to create the Tcl/Tk GUI. I used
freewrap to bundle the C++ shared libraries, Tcl/Tk scripts, and the
base Tcl/Tk system, including cross-building the MS-Windows .exe under
Linux.
JH>
JH> Thanks!
JH>
JH> - Jari
JH>
JH> P.S. Has anyone got experience of CodeWarrior? Is it worth nothing?
JH>
--
\/
Robert Heller ||InterNet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deepsoft.com /\FidoNet: 1:321/153
Posted Via Nuthinbutnews Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
==========================================================
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION **
==========================================================
http://www.nuthinbutnews.com
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Looking for free Terminal Emulator
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:29:49 +0100
"Paul M. Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:vCSm6.101$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anyone please tell me of a free terminal emulator which runs on
> Windows 9X and allows login to a Linux machine? It would be a bonus if
the
> terminal emulator could also properly handle color (like at the linux
> console).
> Thank you in advance for your suggestions and recommendations.
Open a dos prompt and type : telnet <yourhost> ?
------------------------------
From: Robert Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unable to mount...08:32
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 06:41:54 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've had my first major crash of RH6.1. Found a bare X window screen, the X
> 'moire' and a cursor, instead of the default Red Hat xdm screen. Tried to
> reboot, and everything hung when trying to mount NFS. Tried rescue boot,
> and hung at these error messages:
>
> VFS: Cannot open root device 08:32
> Kernel Panic:VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:32
>
> What is "08:32"?
>From file:/usr/src/linux/Documentation/devices.txt (which I understand you
might have difficulty reading right now):
8 block SCSI disk devices (0-15)
0 = /dev/sda First SCSI disk whole disk
16 = /dev/sdb Second SCSI disk whole disk
32 = /dev/sdc Third SCSI disk whole disk
...
240 = /dev/sdp Sixteenth SCSI disk whole disk
Partitions are handled in the same way as for IDE
disks (see major number 3) except that the limit on
partitions is 15.
> looks like I'm in for a fresh install (no backups, unfortunately; my
> floppy-IF Travan tape device isn't recognized). Anyone recommend a
> compatible backup medium for Red Hat Linux?)
Think SCSI; think DAT.
--
The meek shall inherit the earth; but by that time there won't be
anything left worth inheriting.
6:24am up 1 day, 22:54, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.10, 0.05
------------------------------
From: "Nicolas Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: iPaq + Pocketlinux -> le bon plan ????
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 13:39:18 +0100
Bonjour,
Je me renseigne sur le PC de poche iPaq de Compaq tournant avec Pocketlinux
(www.pocketlinux.com ):
Quelles sont les applications dispo ?
La reconnaissance d'�criture est-elle probante ?
+ toutes infos disponible sur la b�te...
Merci d'avance
Nicolas
------------------------------
From: "Jack Kaufmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing windows 2000
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:51:30 GMT
Any idea where I could find the Howto?
"D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jack Kaufmann wrote:
> >
> > I am running Linux (Redhat 7) and windows 98 on separate partitions,
with
> > LILO on the MBR. I would like to install Windows 2000 on a third
partition,
> > and I know it wants to take over the MBR. Can anyone give me any
guidance
> > re how to go about it? Thanks.
>
> There is an NT boot loader howto around somewhere, not sure where. The
> NT boot loader is the same as in Win 2K, and works quite nicely as the
> primary loader. It basically means installing lilo to a partition
> instead of MBR, then using dd to copy your partition boot record to a
> floppy, and then the floppy file to the Win 2k partition. Win 2k can be
> pointed at that file and it will properly direct things over to linux.
> The NT boot loaders is one of the few reliable MS products I know of.
> FYI, you want to avoid support in linux for writing to NTFS, use
> read-only.
------------------------------
From: "Jack Kaufmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing windows 2000
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:53:52 GMT
How did you put lilo on the same hd partition as linux.? And determine that
it was working before installing win2000?
And what (and where) is xosl (xosl.org) ?
"green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:97hrgq$e3s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I put lilo on the same hd partition as linux. (the old mbr one still loads
> linux at this point.)
> then I installed 2000
>
> Make sure you can boot linux from floppy or lilo is installed and working
in
> the linux partition.
>
>
> and I installed xosl (xosl.org) wich saves the origional boot secter in
case
> its needed.
> one entry is nt5's partition the other is linux's
> and use that to select operating systems.
>
> I'm sure other boot managers will allow the same thing.
>
>
>
> "Jack Kaufmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:61Xm6.69$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I am running Linux (Redhat 7) and windows 98 on separate partitions,
with
> > LILO on the MBR. I would like to install Windows 2000 on a third
> partition,
> > and I know it wants to take over the MBR. Can anyone give me any
guidance
> > re how to go about it? Thanks.
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Adam Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Filter text strings from binaries
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 02:00:26 +1300
Hi all,
I'm after a program or technique that will filter/extract text strings
from a binary file. It has to be intelligent enough to avoid characters
that are clearly just part of the code instead of a text string/comment.
I imagine grep might be able to accomplish this, although the pattern
would be quite complicated.
Thanks for your help,
Adam
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Nils O. Sel�sdal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cross-platform development tool?
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:03:52 +0100
"Jari Huovila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi everyone!
>
> There wouldn't happen to be any software development IDE (C++ / Java)
> that would be able to produce binaries for Linux, MacOS and Windows
> from the same source code?
If you do java development , your code is portable, you don not get native
binaries though,
and need a javaVM on each machine to run the program..
www.borland.com/jbuilder is a VERY good ide for java...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
