John Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Jack Barnett wrote:
> > I haven't been following this thread at all, some "short answer" me on
> > the question
> > "Is it proper edict to Cc: or not to Cc:?"
> >
> I think Ray hit the nail RIGHT on the head -- this list has a habit
> of becoming backlogged, so if you think that the person posing the
> question is interested in hearing back ASAP, then I would say
> (IMNSHO) that CC is QUITE proper, as it may be of use to someone else
> in the list. OTOH, if it's not an "urgent" question (ie "now that you
> mention it....") then I wouldn't bother to CC.
> IOW, it's probably a circumstantial thing. :-)
But why should it be up to me to decide whether or not the author
wants a reply ASAP? If someone wanted a urgent answer to their
question they should say so in the message.
--
---Regards, Steve Youngs--------Email:-<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>---
| If Microsoft is the answer, then all I can say is that |
| you are asking the wrong question. |
------------------------------<Don't be a Newbie--Be a Gnu-bie>---
