On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Jack Barnett wrote:
> I haven't been following this thread at all, some "short answer" me on
> the question
> "Is it proper edict to Cc: or not to Cc:?"
>
I think Ray hit the nail RIGHT on the head -- this list has a habit
of becoming backlogged, so if you think that the person posing the
question is interested in hearing back ASAP, then I would say
(IMNSHO) that CC is QUITE proper, as it may be of use to someone else
in the list. OTOH, if it's not an "urgent" question (ie "now that you
mention it....") then I wouldn't bother to CC.
IOW, it's probably a circumstantial thing. :-)
John
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Robbie Scherer
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mike
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Ray Olszewski
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Jack Barnett
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? John Aldrich
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mail Lists
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
