Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 29 Aug 1999, Steve Youngs wrote: > > > Remember people, easier isn't always better or acceptable. > > > No, but sometimes easier is easier for a good reason. Yes, but not in this case. Imagine for a moment that you are Linus Torvalds. How would you feel if everyone on the linux-kernel mailing list Cc'd every message they sent. That would mean that you would get two copies of not only the replies to your posts, but you would also get two copies of every reply of each thread you posted or replied to. I don't know if you have ever read the linux-kernel mailing list but it is definitely a high traffic list (300+ msg/day). -- ---Regards, Steve Youngs--------Email:-<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>--- | If Microsoft is the answer, then all I can say is that | | you are asking the wrong question. | ------------------------------<Don't be a Newbie--Be a Gnu-bie>---
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mike
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mike
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Robbie Scherer
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mike
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Ray Olszewski
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Jack Barnett
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? John Aldrich
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Mail Lists
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Steve Youngs
- Re: Why reply to list and Cc author? Rik Osborne
