On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 02:59:48PM +0300, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>
> It has been said already that there are two main options:
> 
> 1. Start working at once with the AW engineers to send upstream any code
> that is missing (Linux kernel drivers, make upstream u-boot work with all
> AW SoCs, etc). As a resource, those two Linux kernel engineers from AW are
> available to help now. The access to the AW kernel engineers is the most
> important resource.
> Then, the GPL issues would be gradually resolved.
> 
> 2. Get AW to spend resources to go through and vet tarballs of source code.
> I suppose it would take a lot of resources from AW, the result would be old
> versions of the source code and we would not have started yet to talk to
> the engineers.
> This option is a painful option, and should only be the last option.
> 
> In both options, the end result would probably be the same, however Option
> 1 will get results faster and is the most beneficial for the future of the
> community.
> 
> As a community, it makes sense to try Option 1 and see where it gets us in,
> let's say, three months. If we do not get any results, then many more may
> choose to go for Option 2.
> 
> It worries me however that for Option 1, Luc will make this list a living
> hell. He will sabotage any effort in order not to be proved "wrong".
> In this sense, it would be silly for an AW engineer to join the list and
> attempt to discuss here. I can already predict endless questions about
> licensing towards the engineers (these are not for the engineers to
> discuss).
> 
> We have the opportunity to draw a line and move forward.
> Which one is the smartest option?
> 
> Simos

So let me translate your email so everyone knows what you are hinting 
at here: a Fork.

You're actually quite predictable.

Luc Verhaegen.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to