This email got somehow lost. On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:30:57 +0100 Manuel Braga <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:59:48 +0300 Simos Xenitellis > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > We have the opportunity to draw a line and move forward. > > Which one is the smartest option? > > None is the smartest option. Both options are complementary to each > other. That means that there is no need to choose.
To expand. Allwinner only has to make available sourcecode dumps or documentation or whatever, or even have allwinner engineers working in the secret parts that can't be public, and come on with any solution. We, or Allwinner, or both(this community and allwinner) work together in mainlining. Allwinner then can port back to its SDK, and at same time by doing so those "license compliance issues" get resolved. > Nobody is stopping allwinner engineers to participate in this > maillist, or in any other way that is suited to work for mainline > kernel. If they wish. They know what to do, if not we are here to > help them. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
