> Does this action not violate the GPL, by not letting > the software be redistrobuted?
Didn't we cover this already? Nobody is stopping you to make copies. You just can't call them Red Hat. Not that I care, the quality of the distro is lacking anyway, so I just go and use something better. Btw every major distro maker substantially pays for OSS development, not just Red Hat. > > I wonder how many first time users of XYZ distro > > have been frustrated > > because the install process stalls due to poor > > quality CDs? I wonder if > > those users switched to ABC distro or reverted M$ > > instead as a result. All distros would be equally affected, but only Red Hat is writing legal letters. I did say a while ago that they look far too much like Redmond for my liking. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
