On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 19:32, Net Llama despaired:
> Yes, i've heard that SONY's have excellent performance and reputations,
> but they're also very expensive. A SONY 17" costs about the same as the
> NEC 21" that I have. Yes, i know, i got what i paid for.
>
> The thing is, when the monitor is working properly, the picture quality
> is very good. I run it at 1600x1200 85Hz refresh rate, and its crystal
> clear. I happen to have a much older generic brand 17" monitor on
> another box sitting side by side with this one, and the difference in
> picture quality (forget resolution improvement) is startling. My wife
> always ignored me or laughed when i commented in the past that the
> picture quality was better. Now that she's sitting at the older 17",
> she has admitted that there is a noticable difference.
==================================
I'm using a iiyama Vison Master Pro 450, 19" flat screen monitor. The
reviews are excellent, and I'm very pleased after almost 2 years use. I
think they now go for about $400 (give or take...)
~MS
--
"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance."
--Will Durant
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
