On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> I insist that using a unified font for Han ideographs is wrong.
> I wrote it many times. Font must be changed according to the
> language of the (plain) text. Did IRG insist that unified font
> can be used for multilingual text? If yes, please show me the
> sentence. I'll write again. DON'T SHOW ME THE SENTENCE OF HAN
> UNIFICATION ITSELF. It cannot be an evidence that IRG think unified
> font may be used for multilingual text.
I have followed the discussion here from the beginning. But I still cannot
get your point. I agree that every locale, will need it's own font. But
would you please note that you expect so much from plain text?
Would you please tell us your definition of plain text?
--roozbeh
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
