Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote on 2001-02-08 12:53 UTC:
> I insist that using a unified font for Han ideographs is wrong.
> I wrote it many times. Font must be changed according to the
> language of the (plain) text. Did IRG insist that unified font
> can be used for multilingual text? If yes, please show me the
> sentence. I'll write again. DON'T SHOW ME THE SENTENCE OF HAN
> UNIFICATION ITSELF. It cannot be an evidence that IRG think unified
> font may be used for multilingual text.
Please calm down. Neither anybody here on this list nor anyone on the
IRG has -- as far as I know -- ever suggested font unification! You have
just made that up. I'm probably not the only one who has been puzzled
for a few days now, what you make such a fuzz about.
See my next message for a summary of the options that we have already
discussed at length last years to address what you are so concerned
about.
Markus
--
Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
