On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Tom Lord wrote: > My quite personal and uninformed opinion is that the people of > the Unicode Consortium (and the IRG?) think plain text is > wrong. > > You are not correct. I agree. Unicode is a standard for encoding plain text. The Unicode Consortium view (gathered from having been for years on their public mailing list) is that the difference between Japanese and Chinese glyphs is a font issue, not one that should be addressed by Unicode. P. - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Harald Alvestrand
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: CJK Unification Markus Kuhn
- Re: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Harald Alvestrand
- RE: CJK Unification Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- RE: CJK Unification PILCH Hartmut
- RE: CJK Unification PILCH Hartmut
- Re: CJK Unification Markus Kuhn
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Jungshik Shin
- RE: CJK Unification Bruno Haible
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: CJK Unification Alexander Voropay
- Re: CJK Unification Markus Kuhn