Ronald G Minnich wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > This sounds like the "right thing". RAMTEST with no cache is > > SSSSLLLOOOOWWWWWWWWW! ...and doesn't test burst. > > OK, we'll have to put that MTRR WC change in ... > > ron A question about ramtest... will simple scan test all possible access patterns that may be seen in actual code? I mean, if cache misses always generate natuarlly aligned 32 byte sequential reads, bursting won't occur across a cache line boundary, or will it? What about WC writes... does anyone ever bother to analyze at this level?
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Ronald G Minnich
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Ronald G Minnich
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... tyson
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... tyson
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Ronald G Minnich
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: 440BX-Board (GA-6BXS) and SDRAM initialisation ... Eric W. Biederman
