Ronald G Minnich wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This sounds like the "right thing".  RAMTEST with no cache is
> > SSSSLLLOOOOWWWWWWWWW!  ...and doesn't test burst.
>
> OK, we'll have to put that MTRR WC change in ...
>
> ron

A question about ramtest... will simple scan test all possible access
patterns that may be seen in actual code?
I mean, if cache misses always generate natuarlly aligned 32 byte
sequential reads, bursting won't occur
across a cache line boundary, or will it?  What about WC writes... does
anyone ever bother to analyze
at this level?

Reply via email to