On 28 November 2011 00:16, Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) <[email protected]> wrote: > (b) >> improve those stretches to eliminate the accident-causing factors. >> Since banning is still not an option, you will turn to the latter. > > Why can the same argument apply to nuclear technology?
Yes please. Go ahead an make the argument. Not the Kalam-esque "Koodankulam is absolutely safe because I say so", but an argument based on objective thought. To start you off, here is a list of reasons why people don't want the Koodankulam plant. You can ignore the procedural/administrative ones in your first draft, and focus on the technical objections. http://www.transcend.org/tms/2011/08/thirteen-reasons-why-we-do-not-want-the-koodankulam-nuclear-power-project/ Binand -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
