On 11/27/2011 01:08 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Sunday 27 November 2011 12:34:06 Rony wrote: >> On 11/27/2011 12:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> IF we had to factor in the clean up and compensation costs, none of us >>> would want that lovely thing. Fukushima total generated power >>> USD25billion total recovery cost 75billion (with very very lax accounting >>> norms) and climbing. >> Past accidents should be used to make future systems safer, not throw >> them out altogether. > Ah. So let a few million babies with birth defects be born due to some > accident on existing reactors, then we will find out ways to make it safe. In > the meantime we will continue with the halflife problem for 250 odd years. > > Nice going. > > On second thought it might actually be a good idea to have reactors all over > the planet 50 km apart. You will be guaranteed a disaster in all of them > (only that you would not know - state secrets, in every country ;-E. Indian > reactors are totally safe lol). Which should cull our population to > extinction and actually save the earth. Nature and life will do just fine > without the parasites known as humans. > >
Exactly the way software giants spread FUD. -- Freedom is a shared resource. Take some, leave the rest for others. Please trim your replies. Avoid cross posting to other lists. Post your replies below the relevant original text, leaving a line space. Regards, Rony. http://ronybill.blogspot.com/ -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
