Michael Sokolov wrote:
> 2. Every person without exception who expresses an interest in $TOPIC
>    and is able and willing to attend and participate in events in
>    $GEO_AREA has an entitlement right to be a member of the group.  No
>    person who expresses interest in $TOPIC and shows up at the physical
>    events may be denied group membership for ANY reason, even if that
>    person is a terrorist, a serial killer, a cannibal, a child molester
>    or the world's most evil, most horrible and most disgusting person.

Just to be clear - this group is not about terrorism, killing people,
cannibalism, child molestation or any other evil,horrible,disgusting thing.

This group has always been 100% focused on Linux, GNU, Open source
software, Free software, open & compatible hardware, and related
subjects.  (The related subjects means software like Windows or Mac OS
or proprietary Unix is discussed from time to time, etc. but still is
about the technology and how it relates to our central theme.)

The whole point for the group's existence, including participation on
the mailing list is that there is a common interest on that subject area.

If someone is involved, and they are a child molester or serial killer
or whatever in their private life, of course we don't know about this,
we don't care, and we don't get involved in their private life.

So I don't know where you are getting some idea that we are restricting
people based on some "type" of person being screened out or being deemed
an unacceptable person based on who they are.  That is just simply not
happening.

We have never placed any limit on "who" can participate in the group.
We only require every one that participates to adhere to "how" we
participate as a group.


> 3. No group member may exercise any dictatorial powers over any other
>    member.  In particular, no member can ever ban or remove any other
>    member from the group, and no member may ever restrict or moderate
>    any other member's speech under any circumstances for any reason.

This type of "no dictatorial power" concept is something that only
exists in two places:

 1: a group that has no stated topic, and encourages random discussion
on any subject, a group that exists to simply engage in silly,
non-sequitur style banter, a group that allows bashing/flamewars of
others, etc.

 2: a utopia where everyone stays on topic and always participates in a
way which matches the group definition (in our case: Linux, GNU, open
source software, free software, open & compatible hardware, related
subjects).


Michael, I know you aware that our group is focused on it's stated topic
(Linux, GNU, open source software, free software, open & compatible
hardware, etc.)

I'm sure you also understand that with 100 members in a group, it's
likely that some one or more of them will occasionally want to post
content to the list that is not related to the stated topic of the
group.  I'm sure you understand that there are people that might want to
take down the list or ruin its value for others.  How would you prevent
the 1 person from ruining the experience for the other 99?  Explain how
it wouldn't turn into something that you actually don't want to
participate in based on your understanding of the group when you signed up.

Without having any power to control things, there would be nothing to
prevent a subscriber from just polluting or spamming the list with
random garbage, which would not be of benefit to the other members of
the group.

Since we have a stated topic, and if the situation warrants it, someone
will have to moderate things - this prevents discussions from going
offtopic and ruining the value of the group for everyone that is a member.

Michael I hope you eventually understand - YOU get a better group
because of it having a focus, and because there is an expectation of
following that focus.  You don't get e-mails to your inbox everyday
talking about developing software in C# with Microsoft Visual Studio.
You aren't getting e-mails to your inbox everyday where someone is
advertising proprietary software instead of free or homegrown software
that you prefer.

I think you do see the value of the group having a clearly defined
objective.  But if you don't want this, or you don't agree with the
group keeping a focus like this, I encourage you to leave and join one
of the many unmoderated sites on the Internet where you are free to
discuss things unrelated to our group's topic, etc.

Thanks.



_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to