-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/04/2011 08:13 PM, Jeff Lasman wrote: > On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 02:34:58 pm Charles N Wyble wrote: > > > Talk to me when you're ready to consider. I can probably do you very well in > a > datacenter; economies of scale and the fact that the owner and I have become > friends over the years.
Will do. > >> I need to evaluate power usage, higher cost DSL I have for hosting etc. >> I think it would still be cheaper to host at home then in a data center. > > Think $30/mbps/month with 10 mbps commitment. Sure. >> Sure. I have 5 static, public IP addresses. v4 of course. > > I had that as well when I had business grade DSL (swiped to me by Bell (later > AT&T). But they stopped offering it and were pressuring me to switch to > switch to permanent lease dynamic instead. I resisted because I didn't want > to use their router. Not for idealistic reasons as Michael, but rather > didn't > want to pay them for it. Hmmm. I don't need to do that. I just setup the DSL modem in bridge mode. > >> impulse.net >> (att clec) will offer native v6. > > They look interesting but I've never been willing to get one of those hybrid > T-1/data/phone systems; Well that's the main offering on their site, but they do straight DSL as well. I Aalways felt I'd end up paying too much for the > phone part of it. Even now that I've decided to not become a VoIP reseller, > I > still buy at wholesale from Vitelity. Always had my numbers simply forwarded > by Vitelity to my one Vonage number, but I've just ordered a Vitelity vPBX > running PIAF. Nice. I've got a PIAF box deployed and have someone configuring it for me. I hope to have it fully operational in production by end of January. Part of data ownership. :) > >> One can always do v6 via an he tunnel. > But then you need one v4 IP per v6 IP. I think you mean one v4 IP per v6 subnet right? Or are you referring to dual stack? Then you just use NAT64. We can get IPv6 in our datacenter; Nice. I don't think my old switches will > work, though. And DirectAdmin (our hosting management platform) still > requires one v4 IP per box for management. You can always maintain a 10.x network. Plus we will be dual stacked for some time, so having a v4 address is still needed. > > We've got no AS number ourselves; always partnered with others for IP > allocations and management. Sure it's easy enough to pretend to need 512 IP#s > and getting them myself, but it's wasteful. Right. > >> I'm in the process of getting a small swip block from a hoster here in >> LA. So I'll soon be joining the real internet. :) > > We have a commitment for swiping to us, but the DC never followed through on > it; remind me to yell at him <smile>. We do our own rDNS. :) I'm getting the space today. Very exciting stuff. - -- Charles N Wyble (char...@knownelement.com) Systems craftsman for the stars http://www.knownelement.com Mobile: 626 539 4344 Office: 310 929 8793 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNKg+9AAoJEMvvG/TyLEAthhQP/jY8OSS7gdCbbO/aiRZDDXdM wrgUluvGhTPrOJrX9BLh90EcaTVAevJBZLOJjP8vDlp72RSFaGR7N1stvCzSt2ku m2uO4xpYWTFWJfBfdtoUprBCdt5699eoEiJ/saY7CmLUSBNg4j/WkNxYR1fGo1N7 cG2mtB+VnNiZe2CEaziSvPDTKZPSzfS/mtfIC0jrO/PAs4ZYmfxonw5lfws6bdaD kSsNxM1iVXx9r+4zIZgyY0uPwlB6xdEcXj7IwrxusuxWc/T7+pUz2dJReCJtd4s/ C9W2Vn1+z3F4mHsbukM3alXEKgM36XiVOiWRXYM8/LFdGFH44Xcy30ip7DK9yFvy 67yS4Z62/VJEe/EB8B4EBjxjf0ezgPQMMhwFrbr/iV70Ro9IXevZJbIuxLuifVwb d4EhUgPRVz3DO48XbmnbccXgexQFioJTqKf/2b/mxZuTs2n1bpOU8j9bEikp4uUE RuUb7o3GCuEHZ6gCd63hgy9YozXYZtjfPE1N7eR9LZLKoQ2e2/GHAeXUwHr+Gvvs 272y2CC/QoPM/Y+WjVDUqQB3b/PIywiSFnrzv2+LqVJ8bvkqPB4Qid9fpDb6lcyT iGtcs2yDCBYs6yhT0fk877Cr7QY+SJQAWgdQTF2Du2SAkMIQV3mMw4jtHZAH+PjG ZcTyFWv+mO1FX+GaPk7l =eJd8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
