I thought that most server-side Java solutions utilize Sun's JVM, which is
usually installed at installation (eg, JRun)

---
Billy Cravens
HR Web Systems, EDS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Cahall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: RE: Microsoft drops JAVA


> And what about the JVM on the XP server?
>
> Dave Cahall
> Vice President, Professional Services
> Digitaris Technologies, Inc.
> Office: 972.690.4131 ext 116
> Mobil: 214.914.9947
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billy Cravens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Microsoft drops JAVA
>
>
> To some extent I'd agree.  I don't think it will be large enough to sway
> people/companies over to Netscape:
> 1.  it only applies to Windows XP
> 2.  IE/Windows will still support Java; users will need to install it on
> their own, rather than it be there out of the box
>
> As other technologies (like Flash) are becoming more predominant and more
> complex (you can do some amazing stuff with ActionScripting and a
> server-side language like CF), applets matter less.  So
> we're looking at an impact to a subset (users who are unwilling or unable
to
> install Java) of a subset (Users on Windows XP - of course, this will
> increase as time goes on) of a subset (users that utilize pages that are
> dependent upon Java applets) of Web activity out there.  There will be
some
> impact, but likely it will be minimal.  Additionally, consider that
> AOL/Netscape have stated that they really aren't going to focus of their
> browser product.  I really can't see companies shifting from a supported
> technology to an unsupported one simply because one feature requires a
> little effort to get working (you know they'll just offload the effort to
> their IT and helpdesk departments anyways).
>
> ---
> Billy Cravens
> HR Web Systems, EDS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lyndon Hughey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 11:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Microsoft drops JAVA
>
>
> > This move might backfire on Microsoft.  Some companies use a lil client
> side
> > Java on their intranet pages.  This is going to sway these companies to
> use
> > Netscrape.  I know that the browser war is over, but Microsoft wants us
> all.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Palyne Gaenir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 8:17 PM
> > Subject: Microsoft drops JAVA
> >
> >
> > > What impact do folks think this will have on everyone using CF-Java
> > > etc. on the web?
> > >
> > > > "MICROSOFT CORP. is quietly pulling back support for Java in its
> > > > new products, The Wall Street Journal reported. The move deals a
> > > > new blow to a rival technology that played a starring role in the
> > > > software giant's continuing antitrust battle with the government.
> > > > The newspaper said pre-release copies of the Windows XP operating
> > > > system drop the software needed to run Java-based programs. Java
> > > > software is used to create some of the animated and interactive
> > > > features of Web pages and hand-held devices; Web surfers using
> > > > computers with Windows XP won't see those features without loading
> > > > additional software, the paper said. (Reuters 01:35 AM ET
> > > > 07/18/2001 More...) "
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield
anti-
> > > spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> > > questions about this message. MailShield product info:
> www.mailshield.com
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------
> > > To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
> > >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> > spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> > questions about this message. MailShield product info:
www.mailshield.com
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
> spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
> questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org
>



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email server is running an evaluation copy of the MailShield anti-
spam software. Please contact your email administrator if you have any
questions about this message. MailShield product info: www.mailshield.com

-----------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe / unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org

Reply via email to