[ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes

[Mikki Barry]

>Karl,
>
>You wrote:
>> If trademark is included then we also need the other valid groups who use
>> names outside of trademark:
>>
>>      Small businesses
>>
>>      Local businesses
>>
>>      Churches
>>
>>      Schools
>>
>>      Charitable groups
>>
>>      Amateur sports teams
>>
>>      Writers
>>
>>      Parents naming children
>>
>>      People naming pets, objects, computers, or anything
>>
>>      etc
>>
>> In other words, everybody.
>>
>Fine.
>Do you have a business case for it? Do you really think that "amateur sports
>teams", for instance, have been so influential in the history of DNS wars as
>Trademarks? If yes, join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and propose it.
>You may have consensus on it ;>)

Perhaps I'm missing something, but do stakeholders have to make a "business
case?"
>



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________