On Tue, Jan 05, 1999 at 09:41:14AM -0500, Dan Steinberg wrote:
>
[...]
> > Fine.
> > Do you have a business case for it? Do you really think that "amateur sports
> > teams", for instance, have been so influential in the history of DNS wars as
> > Trademarks? If yes, join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and propose it.
> > You may have consensus on it ;>)
> >
> Roberto,
>
> Karl, myself, Mikki, Carl Oppedahl and many others have been making a
> 'business case' for this for several years now.
Excluding TM interests from representation does nothing to further
that business case. In fact, it probably weakens it: TM interests
are very powerful politically, and are simply "routing around" you --
in the network where it matters. I believe that the histrionic
exclusionary antics of DNRC, Milton Mueller, and others, are in the
long run, probably doing more harm than good to non-trademark
interests.
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
