Kent has abandoned his dependence on logic again.
Opposition to special privileges = exclusion.
Reasoned argument = histrionics.
Kent's reply = panic.
( One of these statements may be true. The reader is invited to determine
which it is. )
David Schutt
p.s.
Interest groups lobby. That's what they know how to do. The fact that they
continue to do so to try to gain their particular prize should not come as a
surprise to anyone.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kent
> Crispin
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 1999 9:03 AM
> To: IFWP Discussion List
> Subject: [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes
>
> <snipe>
>
> Excluding TM interests from representation does nothing to further
> that business case. In fact, it probably weakens it: TM interests
> are very powerful politically, and are simply "routing around" you --
> in the network where it matters. I believe that the histrionic
> exclusionary antics of DNRC, Milton Mueller, and others, are in the
> long run, probably doing more harm than good to non-trademark
> interests.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good,
> and you'll be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
