I would be happy to drop the whole "Jeff Williams" issue, if the individual
posting as such would stop saying things like the comment below, without
so much as a hint of truth.

If the lists' membership were static, it would be one thing - as everyone
on the lists now know about this issue. But the membership is not static,
and as we all realized, new individuals tend to believe what they read -
witness the L.A. Times article incident.

So, if the majority think that it doesn't matter, then that's fine by me. I
guess it makes us all look silly either way.

--
Christopher Ambler

"Jeff Williams" said...

>  The reason I ask these questions is that the claim that the INTA is
supporting
>DNSO.ORG is patently false, and we (INEGroup) have 84 members on INTA
>that support our position.


__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to