At 10:33 PM 1/17/99 -0800, Michael Dillon wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>
>> And what of the ccTLDs that are not run by the governments? What of those
>> who are operated out-of-country? What of those who are operated without
>> the oversight (and perhaps even the knowledge) of the government in
>> question?
>
>If they are operated *WITH* the knowledge of the government in question
>then we must assume that they are operated under the oversight of that
>government, however light handed that oversight may be.
This is not even true in the country you and I live in.
>But if you believe that there is a ccTLD that is operated without the
>knowledge of the government of the country that was assigned the ISO
>country code in question, then it is your duty to contact that government
>and inform them of this fact. What the government decides to do about it
>or not do about it, is their business.
You want them alphabetically ?
Governments have almost nothing to do with cctlds.
--
"That's why there is a Protocol SO. To decide what the next
number after 16 is." - Dixon (tinc)
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________