On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 22:45:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I really becoming concerned with your seemingly recent problems being
>> able to grasp reality. I hope you are having this examined and take
>> care of, the effects could be quite serious.
>
>In this case, Dr. Lisse is in good company. If you want to claim that
>com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs, feel free to do so. But don't expect to be
>taken *seriously* if you claim that com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs.
>
>Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then under your definition NONE of the domain holders of
theirname.com.au domains are ccTLD domain name holders, since com.au
is not a ccTLD.
Surely you see how ludicrous this is?
com.au and per.nu and other RFC1591 delegated ccTLD subdomains have as
much right to the ccTLD constituencies as the .NO registry does.
Or Dr. Lisse's .NA, but in light of his recent problems perhaps an
interim administrator should be named until he is certified as having
regained his senses.
--
William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/
