At 04:45 PM 4/26/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I really becoming concerned with your seemingly recent problems being >> able to grasp reality. I hope you are having this examined and take >> care of, the effects could be quite serious. > >In this case, Dr. Lisse is in good company. If you want to claim that >com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs, feel free to do so. But don't expect to be >taken *seriously* if you claim that com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs. The question is not whether they are ccTLDs, the question is whether they should be represented in the ccTLD constituency. FWIW, I can't think of a good reason why they shouldn't. Jay.
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Michael Sondow
- [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
