Willie the Whiner,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 22:45:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> I really becoming concerned with your seemingly recent problems being
> >> able to grasp reality. I hope you are having this examined and take
> >> care of, the effects could be quite serious.
> >
> >In this case, Dr. Lisse is in good company. If you want to claim that
> >com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs, feel free to do so. But don't expect to be
> >taken *seriously* if you claim that com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs.
> >
> >Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Then under your definition NONE of the domain holders of
> theirname.com.au domains are ccTLD domain name holders, since com.au
> is not a ccTLD.
ccTLD = Country Top Level Domain
SLD = Second Level Domain
> Surely you see how ludicrous this is?
Willie, calm down, we all see how ludicrous this is.
> com.au and per.nu and other RFC1591 delegated ccTLD subdomains have as
> much right to the ccTLD constituencies as the .NO registry does.
no, ccTLD SUB-domains are just that, sub-domains. They are not Top
level domains and thus have not.
The constituency, as you full well know, is for the country Top Level
Domain Managers (= Registries).
> Or Dr. Lisse's .NA, but in light of his recent problems perhaps an
> interim administrator should be named until he is certified as
> having regained his senses.
What problems would that be?
You are, of course, professionally qualified to make such statements,
yes?
But, carry on whining, your CC list will appreciate all your postings.
el
