Willie, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes: > I notice you try to be cute with little arguments rather than > answering substance. This isn't the Dr Lisse I remember from the > APTLD and other lists where he so proudly (rightly so) defended > RFC1591 with facts and quotes. > > It is most telling that you are unwilling (unable) to do so now.... RFC 1591 doesn't have anything to do with the ccTLD ICANN constituency. Stop whining. Hm, maybe not, I doubt anyone listens anyway. el
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
