Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report

[sthaug]

> >In this case, Dr. Lisse is in good company. If you want to claim that
> >com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs, feel free to do so. But don't expect to be
> >taken *seriously* if you claim that com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs.
> 
> Then under your definition NONE of the domain holders of
> theirname.com.au domains are ccTLD domain name holders, since com.au
> is not a ccTLD.

Precisely.

> Surely you see how ludicrous this is?
> 
> com.au and per.nu and other RFC1591 delegated ccTLD subdomains have as
> much right to the ccTLD constituencies as the .NO registry does.

That depends entirely on what a ccTLD constituency is supposed to be.
I see no point in *calling* it a ccTLD constituency if it is for *all*
cc domain name holders.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]