Re: [IFWP] Iperdome Status Report

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Fenello writes:
> 
> At 04:45 PM 4/26/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I really becoming concerned with your seemingly recent problems being
> >> able to grasp reality.  I hope you are having this examined and take
> >> care of, the effects could be quite serious.
> >
> >In this case, Dr. Lisse is in good company. If you want to claim that
> >com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs, feel free to do so. But don't expect to be
> >taken *seriously* if you claim that com.au or per.nu are ccTLDs.
> 

> The question is not whether they are ccTLDs, the question is whether
> they should be represented in the ccTLD constituency.

They may be ccSLDs.

> FWIW, I can't think of a good reason why they shouldn't.

They don't belong. The ccTLD constituency is for the country Top Level
Domain Managers (=Registries).

Form a ccSLD, gSLD or even SLD constituency and apply for seats on the 
Names Council.

el