1.
Sorry, you can't say MySpace is "entirely" .NET and still have "parts of
the site" running CF. Even if we're talking about CFMX as a .NET
assembly, it's still CF as a language, not CF as a server that's running
at least the presentation layer.
2.
I wouldn't hesitate in believing it if
I heard they were migrating from CF to .NET on the language side based
on the issues they've had with performance and scale.
1. .NET framework parses the page, therefore its .NET
2. Performance and licensing.
3. Computerjobs.com just ditched CF too for exactly the same reasons.
http://members.microsoft.com/CustomerEvidence/Common/FileOpen.aspx?FileName=10625_ComputerJobs_bizversion_300k.wvx
Its time all of us become ambidextrous developers with .NET + CF as
tools. CF is losing it's biggest sites one by one because of
outrageous pricing for the enterprise product, poor support by adobe
and performance issues.
For a onsey twosey server site, its not an issue but once you start
playing with the big boys, CF doesn't make financial sense.
--Phil
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
[email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
www.HostMySite.com
www.teksystems.com/
