Well, when you announce I"ll certainly be there. There is definitely a need to 
learn it.

Dave Shuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Guys, Aaron Lynch and I have some stuff 
in the works that will hopefully address this topic to some extent.  I am 
working out some details, and am not quite ready to discuss the big picture 
publicly, but know that it is something that I am chewing on.   I will likely 
be sending an email out to the list next week to get feedback. 

Thanks for the input. It is always welcomed.

~d


On 5/11/07, Eric Knipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:This is an interesting 
subject and one that comes up a lot.  I have been a member of the CFUG or 3 or 
4 years now, and I think I've attended 3 sessions that included "intro to 
Mach-II".  To be honest I have a hard time making time for meetings these days 
as it is, so when a subject like that comes up, I write the meeting off, since 
its stuff I already know.  It would be nice if we could roll both a basic and 
advanced Mach-II session into a single meeting. 
  
 Dave, with Mach-II 1.5 coming out, it might make sense to do something like 
this for that session?  Start with an Intro to Mach-II for about 45 minutes to 
an hour, then have a second presenter talk about the new advanced stuff in  
1.5?  Might be enough incentive to attract both the newbies and the old battle 
axes.
  
 eric

 
 On 5/11/07, Christopher Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:  Dave,

I know that several months ago - maybe even last year - the group had several 
presentations on Mach-II. I would really like to learn to use a framework, but 
doing so on my own I think may be more of a challenge than I have energy for 
right now. Would you (or whoever) mind doing an intro to Mach-II session 
sometime? 

Thanks,
Chris

Dave Shuck wrote:   Ron, I was having this discussion the other day with a few 
developers while at cf.Objective().  It has been interesting to watch the past 
few years.  At CFUnited 05, to me it felt like frameworks were still mostly 
done by the advanced guys, but probably over half of the attendees at least 
understood that they should probably better understand what was going on in 
that area.  I am over simplifying a bit, but last year it felt more like 
everyone seemed to understand the value of them even if they didn't use them.  
At  cf.Objective() people look at you funny if you don't use them (unless you 
are Simon Horwith, then people just look at you funny anyway).  Of course that 
is a more advanced group, but it is also the group that is leading many of the 
tends and helping determine a lot of the "best practices" which trickle 
throughout the community.   

There are certainly a lot of cases where frameworks are not necessary, such as 
a small 3-4 page app.   However, I always use Mach-II anyway for the most part. 
 My reasons are:
a) I like the compartmentalization that it offers.  Yes, I can build that 
compartmentalization on my own, but why?  
b) Applications don't ever get smaller.  Most applications that I have worked 
on evolve or die.  It is always a much more pleasant experience to go back into 
an app that is well designed in a framework and add existing funcionality.  
c) Standardization.  This has really come to light as I have worked closely 
with Aaron over the past couple of years on projects.  When you use a 
framework, you don't have to guess where to look for things.  You instinctively 
know.  Whether you work by yourself, or whether you work as a team, standards 
make things much more efficient in my opinion.  
d) Flexability.  I can't stress enough how the concepts of event-driven 
application models with filters, plugins, etc make changes easy.  Things that 
used to take weeks for us to implement in poorly architected legacy 
applications can be implemented in hours.  Yes of course you can create good 
architecture on your own, but frameworks like Mach-II make it an obvious 
direction to go.  
e) I am on Team Mach-II now.  They make me say this stuff.

~Dave

 On 5/11/07, Ron Mast <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:      Hi All,
  
 What determines if an application needs to be programmed using a framework? 
  
 Is it true that we are past the spaghetti code era when programming in basic 
coldfusion?
  
 I need to get this straight in my head, I'm confused at the moment.
  
 Thanks in advance!
  
 Ron Mast
 Truth Hardware
 Webmaster
 507-444-4693
  



_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
   [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
 http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list 
List Archives:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
   www.instantspot.com/
  www.teksystems.com/





-- 
~Dave Shuck 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://daveshuck.instantspot.com 


---------------------------------
 _______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe:    
http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives:      
http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors:    
www.instantspot.com/   www.teksystems.com/   


-- 
http://www.cjordan.us


_______________________________________________ 
Reply to DFWCFUG:
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list 
List Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
   www.instantspot.com/
 www.teksystems.com/



 

_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG:
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives:
     http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/
   http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors:
  www.instantspot.com/
   www.teksystems.com/





-- 
~Dave Shuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://daveshuck.instantspot.com  
_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives: 
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors: 
  www.instantspot.com/
  www.teksystems.com/



        Jimmy L. Harrell
  MBA: E-Business
  Website:www.jimmyharrell.com
  Blog: http://jimmyharrell.instantspot.com
  Local User Groups: Dallas-Ft. Worth Adobe User Group & Dallas-Ft. Worth 
Coldfusion User Group
   




_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives: 
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors: 
  www.instantspot.com/
  www.teksystems.com/

Reply via email to