> On Oct 15, 2014, at 5:01 PM, compdoc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am well-aware of Olivier’s work in this area, as are many in the FreeBSD > > community. > > You’ve failed to disprove anything I've said, even the part about tools. I'm not going to argue with an individual who defines terms to suit his position. > > > You’re still assigning fault to pfSense > > Not at all. I see. "It crashes!", but no detail forthcoming. > But it would be nice if any of this pleasant banter becomes useful by pushing > someone to actually try this type of testing, to find out why it happens. And > if not, oh well... We're not quite ready to publish the results, (because we want people to be able to reproduce them, and maybe put an end to this "benchmarking as a sport"), but yes, the testing is certainly taking place. > By the way, does the C2758 hardware sold by pfSense include pps performance > information? Has anyone with this hardware tested it? (speaking to others who > might be reading this) > > You suggest it can operate at near 'wirespeed', or at least that the OP will > be very happy with a C2758 , but you’ve not proven it. There is no proof, except that which is documented and reproducible. We're doing something like science here. Jim
_______________________________________________ List mailing list [email protected] https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
