Here you go, yes there are error in the interfaces i can not get more detail as i can not run the command pkg_add it is saying that command not found however i know its a server board and it has two bultin LAN. 1 i am using for WAN and For LAN. here is CPU details.
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440 @ 2.83GHz 8 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s) Any guide will be highly appreciated. WAN interface (wan, em0)StatusupMAC addressxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIPv4 address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubnet masxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxGateway IPv4xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIPv6 Link Locaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ISP DNS serversxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMTU1500Media100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets3709795/2014620 (3.06 GB/551.84 MB)In/out packets (pass)3709795/2014620 (3.06 GB/551.84 MB)In/out packets (block)90881/1 (6.59 MB/52 bytes)In/out errors665/0Collisions0LAN interface (lan, em1)StatusupMAC address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIPv4 addressxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubnet mask IPv4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIPv6 Link LocalxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMTU1500Media100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets1071425/2719703 (439.25 MB/2.78 GB)In/out packets (pass)1071425/2719703 (439.25 MB/2.78 GB)In/out packets (block)2040/0 (174 KB/0 bytes)In/out errors2140/0Collisions0 On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo <pablo.localh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey, yes usually you should set 10/100/g to see when the link state > changes, also if the auto protocol is not working or if the cable goes bad > is easier to troubleshoot, have seen this on co-los worldwide. in any > case, setting 10/100 etc shouldnt affect the bandwidth. so the question > here is: which Nic you are using? is it supported? > do you see any network issue/crc issue, alert/errors, or something onthe > logs? via the web interface check if there are any error on the interface > counters. > also: check with ifconfig 'interface name' for crc errors, and the > advertised speeds, paste here the full output of the problematic interface. > > > let us know how it goes. > > > 2016-01-11 3:23 GMT-03:00 Muhammad Yousuf Khan <sir...@gmail.com>: > > > I am remotely supporting one of my client who is using pfsense. i have > > been using pfsense for years and never face such issue in this > > experience, the Client Co-location is recommending to use 100BaseTX full > > duplex setting instead of Auto. i do not know why they required that > since > > i am not in US i never observe this settings recommended by colo people > in > > my country. > > > > > > > > ------------------Server 1 > > > > / > > colo switch-------->[WAN]pfsense[LAN]--------------+ > > > > \ > > > > -----------------Server 2 > > > > - iperf speed test for LAN, between is 50Mbps up and down > > - but iperf test on WAN showing 10Mbps down and 5Mbps up. > > - however my client is saying that assigned speed from colo is 100Mbps. > > > > now i can not find where is the issue. i suspect that issue is with > > 100BaseTX setting. > > > > can anyone please guide me where i am doing wrong and what i can do to > fix > > this. > > any help will be highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Yousuf > > _______________________________________________ > > pfSense mailing list > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > _______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
