How many clients do you have? Why do you want your SQL to be redundant? Why do you want your site server redundant? What are your SLAs?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Hiland Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 1:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices The end result is redundancy in our primary server and SQL database. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices Nooooooo! How many clients do you have? In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. What do you expect to see from your new design? On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any ideas for best practice when it comes to redundancy? Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do any common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? Thanks in advance, Charlie
