Cheers bud
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 18:27, Daniel Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Charlie, here are some details around HA options currently:
> https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh846246.aspx
>
> Paul, here is some details from the Tech Previews for future features:
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/configmgrteam/archive/2015/08/19/now-available-system-center-configuration-manager-technical-preview-3.aspx
>
> Daniel Ratliff
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 1:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices
>
> I like the sound of new HA options Jason. Are you able to elaborate on this
> at present?
>
> Cheers
> Paul
>
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 18:15, Jason Sandys <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> First, there is no CM 2016. The next version of ConfigMgr have not been
> branded.
>
> Next, A CAS and/or multiple primary sites have absolutely no part in
> availability or redundancy. Multiple primary sites are about scalability in
> terms of managed client count *only*.
>
> The statement “the secondary sites are just DPs”, makes no sense. Secondary
> sites must also be MPs. If they are just DPs, then they are not secondary
> sites.
>
> Finally, There are new HA options most likely coming in the next version of
> ConfigMgr so planning now is fairly useless because nothing specific have
> been announced.
>
> J
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Jason Wallace
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 11:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices
>
> Nooooooo!
>
> How many clients do you have?
>
> In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients.
>
> What do you expect to see from your new design?
>
> On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an
> ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary
> sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any ideas for
> best practice when it comes to redundancy?
>
> Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do any
> common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Charlie
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
