I like the sound of new HA options Jason. Are you able to elaborate on this at present?
Cheers Paul > On 5 Oct 2015, at 18:15, Jason Sandys <[email protected]> wrote: > > First, there is no CM 2016. The next version of ConfigMgr have not been > branded. > > Next, A CAS and/or multiple primary sites have absolutely no part in > availability or redundancy. Multiple primary sites are about scalability in > terms of managed client count *only*. > > The statement “the secondary sites are just DPs”, makes no sense. Secondary > sites must also be MPs. If they are just DPs, then they are not secondary > sites. > > Finally, There are new HA options most likely coming in the next version of > ConfigMgr so planning now is fairly useless because nothing specific have > been announced. > > J > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jason Wallace > Sent: Monday, October 5, 2015 11:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Redundancy Best Practices > > Nooooooo! > > How many clients do you have? > > In CM16 you can have 200,000 clients. > > What do you expect to see from your new design? > > On 5 Oct 2015, at 17:41, Charles Hiland <[email protected]> wrote: > > We will be upgrading to SCCM 2016 next year, and I’m trying to figure out an > ideal redundancy setup. At the moment we have one primary and 7 secondary > sites (the secondary sites are just DPs). Does anyone have any ideas for > best practice when it comes to redundancy? > > Currently we are thinking an off-site CAS with two primary servers. Do any > common-place rules stand out that I am overlooking? > > Thanks in advance, > Charlie > > > >
